VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

P.Ayyasamy v. K.Kalimuthu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 June 2026
Bench
M. Nirmal Kumarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 15087/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to accept the petitioner's affidavit to compound the sentence passed in Crl.A.No.197 of 2014 by this Page2 of 4 Court vide the judgment dated 21.12.2024 reversing the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore in C.C.No.48 of 2012 dated 21.01.2014 and acquit the petitioner / accused.

¶2The petitioner who is the accused in C.C.No.48 of 2014 for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, was acquitted by the Trial Court on 21.01.2014. Aggrieved against the same, the respondent filed an appeal before this Court in Crl.A.No.197 of 2014 and this Court by a judgment dated 21.12.2024 set aside the judgment made by the Trial Court. Further, this Court convicted the petitioner herein with one year imprisonment and to pay the Cheque amount of Rs.2 Lakhs as compensation. During the interregnum period there was some negotiations took place and both the parties have amicably settled the issue by executing a joint compromise memo dated 26.08.2025. Now, the petitioner is before this Court seeking to compound the offence.

¶3On perusal of records, it is seen that as per the joint compromise memo, the petitioner had repaid the amount of Rs.4 Lakhs towards the settlement. Though this Court in Crl.A.No.197 of 2014 dated 21.12.2024 ordered to repay the amount of Rs.2 Lakhs as compensation to the respondent, upon negotiation, the petitioner is now willing to pay a sum of Rs.4 Lakhs. Page3 of 4

¶4In view of the above, the issue was settled between the parties. Both the petitioner and the respondent appeared through video conference. They were identified by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶5In the result, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The offence under Section 138 of the NI Act against the petitioner is hereby compounded as the petitioner had already paid the amount of Rs.4 lakhs towards compensation to the respondent as agreed in the joint compromise memo, entered into between the parties. The joint compromise memo dated

26.08.2025 shall form part and parcel of this order. 16-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order JER To The Judicial Magistrate No.I Coimbatore. CRLoOPoNo.o15087oofo2026 M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. JER CRLoOPoNo.o15087oofo2026 16-06-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR P.Ayyasamy S/o.Planisamy, 2/72, Ammasai gounder street, Vanjikka thottam, Vellakinar, Coimbatore - 641 029 ..Petitioner(s) Vs K.Kalimuthu S/o.Karuppan, D.No.5/184-1, Sumangali Nagar, thopampatti, coimbatore North, coimbatore - 641 017 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to accept the petitioners affidavit and pleased to compound the sentence passed in Crl.A.No.197 of 2014 by this Honble Court dated 21.12.2024 reversing the judgement of acquittal passed in the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I Coimbatore in C.C.No.48 of 2012 dated 21.01.2014 and acquit the petitioner/ accused and pass all such further or other orders that the Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Kamalanathan for M/s. A.PARTHASARATHY and associates For Respondent(s): Mr.Sabarivasan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.