VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Karuppayi v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 33970/2023

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.08.2023. Page2 of 4

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's husband was awarded the contract for the Out sourcing of Operation and Maintenance of CWSS for the period from 01.11.2018 to 31.03.2019. Due to Parliament Elections in the year 2019, the first respondent instructed the second respondent to extend the existing maintenance agreement for an additional three months, specifically until 30.06.2019. While the petitioner received payment of Rs.78,59,179/- for works completed between 01.11.2018 and 31.03.2019, the respondents have failed to settle the dues for the extended period (31.03.2019 to

30.06.2019). The outstanding amount for this period totals Rs.12,69,449/-. Therefore, the petitioner's husband made a representation dated 26.08.2023 before the respondents to release the payment. However, the same was not considered by the respondents, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Learned counsel for the first respondent would submit that the respondents have settled the entire amount due for the initial period (01.11.2018 to 31.03.2019) in accordance with the agreed terms and conditions. However, regarding the additional work performed during the extended period i.e., from

31.03.2019 to 30.06.2019, the payment remains subject to approval from the tender committee.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 4

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the petitioner, this Court directs the respondents to release a sum of Rs.12,69,449/- payable to the petitioner's husband for the works carried out during the extended period from

31.03.2019 to 30.06.2019, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As the matter has been pending for five years, the petitioner's husband is entitled to interest on the belated payment. However, it is left to the respondents to determine the interest amount in accordance with the due process of law.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. List the case on 27.04.2026 under the caption "For Reporting Compliance". 25-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Note to Registry: Issue order copy on 27.03.2026 Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:

¶1The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai 600005.

¶2The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board Project Maintenance Division, Madurai. 25-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Karuppayi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai 600005. 2. The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board Project Maintenance Division, Madurai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the payment due to the petitioner to the tune of Rs.12,69,449/- in respect of Agreement No.SE/MDU/TWAD/No.15/2018-2019 dated 14.12.2018 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. For Petitioner(s): M/s.T.Hemalatha For Respondent(s): M/s.Y. Kavitha for R1 No appearance for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.