VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Balasubramaniam v. The District Collector

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 1487/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed to forbear the respondents from putting up any structure or passenger shed in front of the petitioner's commercial building on the pavement of Highway NH-45C at Survey No.204/1L4 Sethiyathope Town, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District, obstructing the access to the petitioner's property and free movement of men and materials to the petitioner's commercial shops and building.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Highways Authorities proposed to construct a Bus stop in the Highways Road in front of the property belongs to the petitioner. It is contended that the right of access to the property cannot be taken away by constructing a Bus stop. The petitioner has got a right of property, so also to run his business in a peaceful manner. In the event of allowing any construction in the Highways, the petitioner will be deprived of his right of business in the particular locality. Hence, the petitioner come forward with the present writ petition to forbear the respondents from putting up any construction in front of his property.

¶3Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 would submit that in the present case, the construction of bus shelter has already been completed without obstructing the ingress and egress to the Page3 of 4 petitioner's property and the same was put into use for the benefit of the public. Accordingly, he prays for appropriate orders.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the rival submissions and the fact that the construction of bus shelter has already been completed, the primary concern regarding the total deprivation of access has been addressed that the bus shed was constructed without obstructing the ingress and egress to the petitioner's property. Moreover, there are no encroachments in the pavement and the bus shelter is about 6 meters away from the National Highway. It is pertinent to note that the said bus shelter benefits the public at large, more particularly in the summer and rainy seasons. As the bus shelter was constructed for public welfare without impeding the petitioner's access to his property, this writ petition is found to be devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed. In the result, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. VM To:

¶1The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶2The Divisional Engineer, National Highways, National Highways NH – 45C, Tanjore Division, Tanjore.

¶3The Executive Officer, Sethiyathope Town Panchayat, Sethiyathope, Cuddalore District. 06-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and WMP No. 1506 of 2024 M.Balasubramaniam ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2. The Divisional Engineer, National Highways, National Highways NH – 45C, Tanjore Division, Tanjore. 3. The Executive Officer, Sethiyathope Town Panchayat, Sethiyathope, Cuddalore District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from putting up any structure or passenger shed in front of the petitioner's commercial building on the pavement of Highway NH-45C at Survey No.204/1L4 Sethiyathope Town, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District, obstructing the access to the petitioner's property and free movement of men and materials to the petitioner's commercial shops and building. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.P.R.Thiruneelakandan For Respondent(s) : Mrs.S.Anitha, SGP for R1 & 2 Ms.R.Anitha, SGP for R3 Page2 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.