VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Devaiyanai v. The Secretary to Government

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 April 2026
Bench
Anita Sumanthauthor, Sunder Mohan
Case no.
HCP 1846/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Anita SumanthFollow Sunder Mohan

Judgment

ORDER (Made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) This petition is filed by the mother of Vadivarasan, S/o Jayakumar who has been branded as 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act) and confined in Central Prison, Vellore.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner challenges the detention order on several grounds, emphasizing primarily that the subjective satisfaction accorded by the authority has no basis.

¶3We have heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor who supports the impugned order.

¶4The detaining authority in the order of detention dated

31.08.2025 has justified the detention on the ground that the detenu is likely to be enlarged on bail comparing his case to the case of the accused in Crl.M.P.No.1915 of 2024 where bail was granted on

22.11.2024.

¶5We have perused bail order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kanchipuram and find that the facts on the basis of which bail was granted in that case are different and distinct when compared to the facts in the present case. The detenu has three adverse cases, and had sought bail, which was dismissed.

¶6In the case of the accused in Crl.M.P.No.1915 of 2024, the offence is a solitary offence and bail was granted on the basis of a compromise between the parties. Hence, we find nothing comparable between the facts in that case and the present case and agree with the petitioner that the subjective satisfaction on the basis of which the detention order was passed, stands vitiated on this score.

¶7In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in C3/D.O.No.30/2025, dated 31.08.2025 is set aside.

¶8The detenu, viz., Vadivarasan, S/o. Jayakumar, aged 28 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Vellore, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.]

01.04.2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order vs Note : Issue Today To

1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate of Vellore District, Vellore.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District, Vellore.

4.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore.

5.The Inspector of Police, K.V.Kuppam Police Station, Vellore District.

6.The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai

7.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. and SUNDER MOHAN,J. vs H.C.P.No. 1846 of 2025

01.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Devaiyanai, Female, aged 55 years, W/o. Jayakumar, No.3/341, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Semmankuttai Village, Melmayil Post, K.V.Kuppam Taluk, Vellore District. .. Petitioner vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate of Vellore District, Vellore. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District, Vellore. 4.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore. 5.The Inspector of Police, K.V.Kuppam Police Station, Vellore District. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 31.08.2025 in C3/D.O.No.30/2025 against the petitioner's son Vadivarasan, Male, aged 28 years, S/o. Jayakumar, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Raman For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.