- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 July 2026
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- CMA 2123/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow N. Anand Venkatesh
Judgment
JUDGMENT This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed challenging the award passed by the learned Chief Judge, Small Causes Court, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai, in MACTOP No. 2407 of 2011 dated
12.02.2020, wherein the claimants are seeking enhancement of compensation fixed by the Tribunal.
¶2The first and second claimants are the parents and the third claimant is the brother of the deceased S.Kavitha. The case of the claimants is that on 18.04.2008, the deceased was travelling as a pillion rider on a two wheeler belonging to the 1st respondent on the Pichatur-Puttoor road and at about 08.00 a.m., due to the rash and negligent driving of the rider, the two wheeler met with an accident. As a result, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to injuries on 28.04.2008. It is under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal.
¶3The Tribunal, on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the rider of the two wheeler.
¶4Having rendered the above finding, the Tribunal proceeded to fix the total compensation at Rs.7,64,000/- under various heads as follows: Sl.No. Heads Compensation awarded by the Tribunal (in Rs.)
¶1Loss of Dependency 7,29,000
¶2Funeral expenses 15,000
¶3Loss of Love and Affection 20,000 Total 7,64,000 The above compensation was directed to be paid by the second respondent/Insurance Company along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. Aggrieved by the same, the claimants have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.
¶5Heard Ms.N.Lavanya, learned counsel for the appellants/claimants and Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan, learned counsel for the second respondent/Insurance Company.
¶6This Court, also carefully considered the materials available on record and went through the award passed by the Tribunal.
¶7In the case in hand, the accident had taken place in the year 2008. While calculating the compensation under the head 'loss of dependency', the Tribunal proceeded to fix the notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.4,500/- and also added 40% towards future prospects. In the considered view of this Court, the notional monthly income fixed by the Tribunal is on the lower side. Hence, this Court is inclined to fix the notional monthly income of the deceased at Rs.5,000/- and add 40% towards future prospects.
¶8Accordingly, the compensation under the head 'loss of dependency' is calculated as follows: Monthly Income : Rs. 5,000/-Add:40% future prospects : Rs. 2,000/-------------------Rs. 7,000/-Less: Personal expenses (1/2) : Rs. 3,500/-------------------Rs. 3,500/-x 12 ------------------Annual income : Rs. 42,000/-Multiplier : x 18 ------------------Loss of Dependency : Rs. 7,56,000/-------------------
¶9The Tribunal has granted compensation under the head 'loss of love and affection' only to the first claimant, to the tune of Rs.20,000/-. In the case in hand, the father of the deceased was alive at the time of filing the claim petition but he died during the pendency of the case. Therefore, the Tribunal ought to have fixed the compensation under the head 'loss of consortium' for the father also. Similarly, the third claimant, who is the brother of the deceased, is also entitled to compensation under the head "loss of love and affection". In view of the same, this Court is inclined to fix the compensation under the head 'loss of consortium' at Rs.90,000/- (Rs.30,000 x 3).
¶10The Tribunal has not fixed any compensation under the heads "loss of estate" and "transportation charges". Therefore, this Court is inclined to award compensation under the heads 'loss of estate' and 'transportation charges' at Rs.15,000/- and Rs.10,000/- respectively.
¶11In the light of the above discussion, this Court modifies the compensation in the following manner: Sl.No. Heads Awarded by the Tribunal (in Rs.) Modified by this Court (in Rs.)
¶1Loss of Dependency 7,29,000 7,56,000
¶2Funeral expenses 15,000 15,000
¶3Loss of Love and Affection 20,000 -
¶4Loss of Consortium - 90,000
¶5Loss of Estate - 15,000
¶6Transportation Charges - 10,000 Total 7,64,000 8,86,000
¶12The compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.7,64,000/- is enhanced to Rs.8,86,000/-. The second respondent/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, less the amount already deposited, together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the appellants/claimants will not be entitled for interest for the period of delay of 2212 days as was ordered by this Court in C.M.P.No.24013 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.151267 of 2025 dated
10.06.2026. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the appellants. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered.
¶13In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.
10.07.2026 ham To
¶1The Chief Judge, Small Causes Court, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai.
¶2The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Madras. N. ANAND VENKATESH
, J.
ham
10.07.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.07.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH 1. Tamil Selvi 2. Thiyagarajan ... Appellants Vs. 1. M.Alphones 2. Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Heavitree Unit No.1, 3rd Floor, No.23, Spur Tank Road, Chetpet, Chennai – 600 031. ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to enhance the award against the judgment and decree dated 12.02.2020 made in MACTOP No.2407 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chief Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. For Appellants : Ms.N.Lavanya for Ms.M.Malar For Respondents : Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan for R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.