VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Visalachi v. The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2026
Bench
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Case no.
HCP 1966/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Anita SumanthFollow Sunder Mohan

Judgment

ORDER (Made by SUNDER MOHAN, J.) The mother of the detenu - Ajith alias Ajithkumar, has been branded as Drug Offender under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 30.08.2025.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the detention order is liable to be set aside on the ground that the Government Order furnished to the detenu has not been translated into the language known to the detenu and that the special report is undated. He would submit that the detention order in respect of the co-accused in order dated 26.02.2026 has been quashed by this Court in HCP.No.1977 of 2025 for the very same reasons.

¶3Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶4We find from the booklet supplied to the detenu that the Government Order has not been translated in Tamil which is the language known to the detenu and the special report is undated, depriving his right to make an effective representation. The detention order passed against a similarly placed detenu was quashed by this Court in HCP No.1977 of 2025.

5.In light of the above discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in Cr.M.P.No.51/Drug Offender/2025 C1, dated 30.08.2025 is set aside.

6.The detenu, viz., Ajith alias Ajithkumar, S/o.Ravi, aged 24 years, now confined in Central Prison, Coimbatore, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 23-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mpl Note to Registry : Issue Today To

¶1The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶2The District Magistrate and District Collector, Erode District, Erode.

¶3The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode.

¶4The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶5The Inspector of Police, Erode Town Police Station, Erode.

¶6The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶7The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. HCPoNo.o1966oofo2025 DR.ANITAoSUMANTHoJ. AND SUNDERoMOHANoJ. mpl HCPoNo.o1966oofo2025 23-03-2026 Pageo5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Visalachi, F/60 years, W/o. Ravi, No.98, 2nd Street, VVCR Nagar, Erode District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The District Magistrate and District Collector, Erode District, Erode. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode. 4. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore. 5. The Inspector of Police, Erode Town Police Station, Erode. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, in the nature of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records relating to the detention order dated 30.8.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings No.Cr.M.P.No.51/Drug Offender/2025 C1 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the petitioner's son namely Ajith @ Ajithkumar, son of Ravi, aged about 24 year, who is presently undergoing detention in the Central Prison, Coimbatore as Drug Offender before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Vinoth For Respondent(s): Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted By Mr. M. Sylvester John

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.