VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Vediappan v. State Rep By, the Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 June 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
WP Crl. 990/2025

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents 2 to 4 based on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.03.2025, as transferred for investigation to the 1st respondent vide report dated 24.07.2025 by the Inspector of Police DCB II, Dharmapuri and investigate and remit the deposited amount to the petitioner.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 1st respondent and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and perused the documents placed on record. Page3 of 5

¶3It is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent that already on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Erode, registered the case in Crime No.2 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 120-B, 409, 420 IPC and Section 5 of TNPID Act, 1997 alleging that the accused had defrauded a sum of Rs.61,43,97,177/- from 398 depositors so far. After completion of enquiry, charge sheet was filed and the same has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.13 of 2025 on the file of the TANPID Court, Coimbatore. While pending trial, the Investigation Officer, namely, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Erode, filed an application under Section 193(9) of BNSS seeking permission to conduct further investigation on the ground that some of the suspects were left out and they were not included. The accused have committed crime all over Tamilnadu, therefore, in view of the above, application filed by the Investigation Officer in Crl.M.P.No.17 of 2026 was allowed by the trial court by an order dated 02.03.2026, thereby permitted the Investigation officer to conduct further investigation and file additional final report.

¶4Considering the fact that the petitioner is also one of the victim, therefore, the petitioner is directed to approach the investigation officer, viz., Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Erode and lodge Page4 of 5 a complaint, on receipt of the same, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Erode is directed to record the statement of the petitioner along with other victims, if any, and file additional final report, as directed by the trial court. With the above said direction, the present Petition is disposed of. No costs. 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssd To

¶1State Rep By, The Superintendent Of Police DCB, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Erode

¶3The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Madras WPoCrl.oNo.o990oofo2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,eJ. ssd WPeCrl.eNo.e990eofe2025 29-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN C.Vediappan S/o. Chinnapaiyan (Late), No.53/33A, Annamalai Gounder Street, Dharmapuri District – 636 701 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep By, The Superintendent of Police, DCB, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District 2. S.Naveenkumar S/o. Shanmugam, Managing Director, Unique Exports, D.No.4, Chinnamuthu Mudali Veethi, Idayankattu Valasu, Erode - 638011 3. P.Arumugam S/o. Palanivel, Bharath Petrol Bunk, Near Arasampatti Post, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 4. G.Manikandan S/o. Gavarappan, Panandur Village, Arasampatti Post, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 5 Prayer: Writ Petition Criminal filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents 2 to 4 based on the petitioner's complaint dated 29.03.2025 as transferred for investigation to the 1st respondent vide report dated 24.07.2025 by the Inspector of Police DCB II, Dharmapuri and investigate and remit the deposited amount to the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Ganesan For Respondent(s): Mr.Ganesh Kumar for R1 Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side) Mr.N.Ponraj for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.