VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Jothi v. The Commissioner,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 July 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
WP Crl. 1050/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. Ilanthiraiyan

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed for a direction, directing the 1st respondent herein to conduct enquiry and to take appropriate action as against the respondents 2 to 4 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2025.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶3On perusal of the complaint lodged by the petitioner revealed that she made several allegations as against the respondents 2 to 11 herein. All the allegations as against the Police Officials and others and as such, the 1st respondent forwarded the complaint to the Additional Superintendent of Police, Cyber Crime, Salem District. In turn, the Additional Superintendent of Police, Cyber Crime, Salem District conducted detailed and exhaustive enquiry on the complaint lodged by the petitioner and submitted enquiry report as the allegations levelled in the complaint found to be false. Further, the enquiry report also revealed that the purchasers of the land by three persons, who belonged to other community persons and have used the petitioner to send such a false complaint with false allegations to achieve their target. Further, it was found that the land comprised in Survey No.53/3 situated at Lakkampatty Village, Mettur Taluk admeasuring to an extent of

4.78 acres is in possession and enjoyment of the respondents 8 to 11 and their family members.

¶4The petitioner lodged the present complaint only on the instigation of the other three persons, who belonged to other community persons in the area without any appropriate documents and right over the said property. That apart, the 8th respondent herein also filed a suit as against the petitioner and others in O.S.No.110 of 2025 on the file of the District Munsif, Mettur and the same is pending for adjudication. Therefore, the direction sought for in this writ petition (criminal) is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶5Accordingly, the Writ Petition (Criminal) is dismissed. No costs.

07.07.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order dm To

1.The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Commission for Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes, 737, Anna Salai Service Lane, Annasalai, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 002.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN

, J.

dm

07.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Jothi … Petitioner vs. 1.The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Commission for Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes, 737, Anna Salai Service Lane, Annasalai, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 002. 2.Arokiaraj 3.Tholcopian 4.Nagaraj 5.Amsa 6.Govindaraj 7.Murugesan 8.Ponnusamy 9.Prabhu 10.Ramani … Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to conduct enquiry and to take appropriate action as against the respondents 2 to 4 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabakaran For R1 : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) For R2 to R11 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.