VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

S.Sujayath Ahamed v. The Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 November 2025
Bench
P.B. Balajiauthor
Case no.
WP 41146/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.B. Balaji

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 26.05.2025.

¶2Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶3The petitioner, after obtaining information under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, has brought to the notice of the respondents that the property belonging to the temple has been alienated without following the mandate of Section 34 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR & CE) Act, 1959. The petitioner has, therefore, given a representation dated

26.05.2025 directing the respondents to take effective steps against the unlawful alienation of the temple property. The petitioner's grievance is that the authorities have not passed any orders on his representation despite the lapse of 6 months. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file this writ petition.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation has already been forwarded by the 2nd respondent to the 3rd respondent on

30.06.2025 and that the 3rd respondent will take appropriate steps to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding the protection of the temple's property.

¶5In the light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to take effective steps to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 26.05.2025 on merits and in accordance with law and to pass final orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

04.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes / No srn To

¶1The Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034

2.The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai Region-2, 130, Ramakrishna Madam Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004

3.The Executive Officer Sri Arulmigu Ramanatheeswarar Temple, Porur, Chennai-600 116

P.B. BALAJI, J,

srn

04.11.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI S.Sujayath Ahamed ......Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034 2.The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai Region-2, 130, Ramakrishna Madam Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004 3.The Executive Officer Sri Arulmigu Ramanatheeswarar Temple, Porur, Chennai-600 116 .....Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the dispose of the petitioners representation dated 26.05.2025 based on the RTI reply dated 21.05.2025 and to initiate Suo-Motu Proceedings under Section 34 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 to declare the sale as void ab initio, restore the property to the temple records and present any further alienation or encumbrance of the said temple land within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.J.Arunkumar For Respondents:Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.