VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Suriya v. The Secretary to Government

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 April 2026
Bench
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Case no.
HCP 2088/2025

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The sister of the detenu – Mathivanan S/o. Sundararajan, aged 34 years, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated

23.09.2025, branding him as 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982).

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. Page3 of 6

¶3Though several grounds have been raised, we are of the view that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind.

¶4In the grounds of detention, the detaining authority has stated that the detenu had filed applications for bail before the Sessions Court and the High Court and both the applications were dismissed. He had further observed that the sponsoring authority had stated that his sister is taking steps to take him out on bail.

¶5We find from the statement of the petitioner's sister that it is neither signed nor dated. We have in HCP No. 1684 of 2025, dated

01.04.2026, held that, the unsigned statement cannot be relied upon to infer that the detenu is likely to file bail application.

6.Therefore, the reliance placed on the said statement by the detaining authority to arrive at the satisfaction that there is a real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail is misconceived. Thus, the inference that the detention is warranted since the detenu is likely to Page4 of 6 indulge in further criminal activities after his release on bail is based on the said erroneous premise. Hence, the detention order is liable to be quashed.

7.In light of the above discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in Detention Order Memo No.140/TNPD/APC/2025, dated 23.09.2025 is set aside.

8.The detenu, viz., Mathivanan S/o. Sundararajan, aged about 34 years, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 29-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order TSG Note: Issue order today. Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Secretary to the Government Government of Tamilnadu,

(Home) Prohibition and Excise Dept, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

¶2The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police (Goondas Section) Avadi, Chennai - 600 054.

¶3The Inspector of Police (Law and Order) M-6, Manali Police Station, Chennai.

¶4The Superintendent Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

¶5The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

¶6The Joint Secretary to Government, Public (Law and Order), Secretariat, Fort.St. George, Chennai – 9. HCPoNo.o2088oofo2025 DR.ANITAoSUMANTH,oJ. AND SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. TSG HCPoNo.o2088oofo2025 29-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Suriya ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government Government of Tamilnadu, (Home) Prohibition and Excise Dept, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police (Goondas Section) Avadi, Chennai - 600 054. 3. The Inspector of Police (Law and Order) M-6, Manali Police Station, Chennai. 4. The Superintendent Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records connected with the order of the 2nd respondent herein in Memo No.140/TNPD/APC/2025 dated 23.09.2025 passed against the Page2 of 6 petitioner's brother the detenu namely Mathivanan S/o. Sundararajan, aged about 34 years. who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai and set aside the same, consequently directing the respondents herein to produce the body or person of the detenue before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Magesh For Respondent(s): Mr. R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor, Assisted By Mr. M.Sylvester John

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.