VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R. Raja v. The Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2026
Bench
The Chief Justice, G.Arul Murugan
Case no.
WP 41942/2025

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The matter has been listed today under the caption "for being mentioned" at the instance of the Registry pointing out typographical errors that crept in the order dated 23.03.2026.

¶2The following errors in the order dated 23.03.2026 are brought to our notice:

(a) In the cause-title, 6th respondent was not shown and 7th respondent was shown as 6th respondent;

(b) In paragraph 4, only 7th respondent was impleaded and not 6th respondent; and

(c) In paragraph 5, direction has been issued to 7th respondent and not 6th respondent.

¶3Learned State counsel submits that they have filed only status report and not counter affidavit, as stated in paragraph 5.

¶4Accordingly, the following modifications shall be made in the order dated 23.03.2026:

(i) The Inspector, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board, Arulmigu Subramaniya Swamy, Maduranthakam, Chengalpet, shall be shown as 6th respondent in the cause-title;

(ii) The words "6th respondent" shall be replaced with "7th respondent" in paragraphs 4 and 5; and

(iii) The words "counter affidavit" shall be replaced with "status report" in paragraph 5. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)

07.04.2026 kpl IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 41942 of 2025 R. Raja S/o.Ramasamy, No.16b, Thirowpathy Amman Temple, Sothupakkam, Chengalpet District, Pincode-603 319 ..Petitioner Vs

¶1The Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowment Board, Chennai-34.

¶2District Collector Chengalpet-603 001

¶3Revenue Divisional Officer Maduranthakam-603 306

¶4Assistant Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowment Board, Chengalpattu

¶5The Commissioner Maduranthakam Municipality, Maduranthakam.

¶6The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Kanchipuram. (R6 suo-motu impleaded as respondent by order dated 23.03.2026) ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the encroachments over the survey Number 972/1 measuring 0.53.5 hectors at Maduranthakam town and Taluk, chengalpattu District, consequently to restore the pond (kulam)in the said survey number in its original style. For Petitioner : Mr. G.Sri Venkatesh For Respondent(s): Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader (HR & CE) For R1, R4 And R6. Mr. K. Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate For Rr2 And R3. Mr. P. Srinivas Standing Counsel For R5. Order (Order of the Court was made by The Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶2This writ petition, styled as public interest litigation, has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a direction to the respondents to remove the encroachments over the survey Number 972/1 measuring 0.53.5 hectares at Maduranthakam town and Taluk, chengalpattu District, consequently to restore the pond (kulam)in the said survey number in its original style.

¶3The fourth respondent has filed a counter affidavit, in which it is stated that survey was conducted by the temple authorities and it is ascertained that 27 persons have encroached part of the temple tank by erecting permanent structures. The Assistant Commissioner, HR and CE Department has sent a report dated 15.12.2025 to the Joint Commissioner, Kanchipuram with the details of encroachments and to take eviction proceedings under Section 78 of the HR and CE Act. The Joint Commissioner, Kanchipuram has taken proceedings under Section 78 and issued summons dated 18.12.2025 to all the encroachers and necessary steps have already been initiated as per law against all the encroachments made in and around the temple tank.

¶4In view of the aforesaid, the Joint Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Kanchipuram is suo-motu impleaded as 6th respondent in this writ petition. Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the newly impleaded 6th respondent.

¶5In view of the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent, the 6th respondent is directed to complete the enquiry proceedings under Section 78 of the HR and CE Act as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) months from today, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned.

¶6With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN J.) 23-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KST To

¶1The Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowment Board, Chennai-34.

¶2District Collector Chengalpet-603 001

¶3Revenue Divisional Officer Maduranthakam-603 306

¶4Assistant Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowment Board, Chengalpattu

¶5The Commissioner Maduranthakam Municipality, Maduranthakam.

¶6The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Kanchipuram. THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN J. KST WP No. 41942 of 2025 23-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN R. Raja S/o.Ramasamy No.16b,Thirowpathy Amman Temple Sothupakkam, Chengalpet District Pincode-603 319. Petitioner(s) Vs The Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowment Board Chennai-34 and 4 others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Sri Venkatesh For Respondent(s): Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Spl. Govt. Pleader (HR&CE) for R1, R4 & R6 Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for R2 & R3 Mr.P.Srinivas Standing Counsel for R5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.