VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

S.Pramila v. The Inspector of Police

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 November 2025
Bench
S Justice T.V.Thamilselviauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 30056/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice T.V.Thamilselvi

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.9594/2025 in Crime No.124/2025 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai dated 09.10.2025 by relaxing the conditions clause (b) in Cri.M.P.No.7043/2025 dated 19.08.2025.

¶2The petitioner has filed Crl.MP. No. 7043 of 2025 before the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai, apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 179 and 180 BNS in crime No. 124 of 2025. On hearing both sides, the Sessions judge granted bail to the petitioner on the condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m.,. Thereafter, the petitioner herein filed Crl.MP. No. 9594 of 2025 in Crl.M.P No. 7043 of 2025 for relaxation of condition imposed in Crl.MP. No. 7043 of 2025. Upon hearing both sides, the Sessions judge, directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent police weekly once. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed this petition.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against A3 is that she handed over fake currency note to A1. In turn, A1 attempted to deposit the said note before the bank. As on date the petitioner has complied with the conditions imposed by the Trial Court. The petitioner is widow living with male child, who underwent operation and the petitioner alone taking care of her son. Hence, he prays to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the petitioner is complying with condition.

¶5Heard both sides.

¶6A perusal of records, it is apparent that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by the Court. Hence, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to report before respondent police as and when required for interrogation. Thus, the order passed in Crl.MP. No. 9594 of 2025 in Crl.M.P No. 7043 of 2025 by Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai is set aside and this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. 12-11-2025 pbl To

1.The Inspector of Police Cyber Crime Branch, Forgery Investigating Wing, Beta-10, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai. T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl CRL OP No. 30056 of 2025

12-11-2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI 1. S.Pramila W/o. Late Mr.Suresh Kumar, Shiv Shaiyadri, CHS, C-32/16, Jui Nagr, Gaon Devi Cowk, Sector-24, Navi Mumbai, Thane, Sanpada, Maharastra-400705. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector of Police Cyber Crime Branch, Forgery Investigating Wing, Beta-10, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai. Respondent(s) PRAYER To set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.9594/2025 in Crime No.124/2025 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai dated 09.10.2025 by relaxing the conditions clause (b) in Cri.M.P.No.7043/2025 dated 19.08.2025 and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): R.Venkatesh S. Jayaprakash S. Ajith D.Aaron For Respondent(s): A. Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.