VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

B.Chandhana v. S.Prasanth

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 February 2026
Bench
A.D.Maria Cleteauthor
Case no.
TR CMP 1240/2025

Judgment

ORDER Heard.

¶2This transfer miscellaneous petition is filed by the petitioner/wife seeking to withdraw the HMOP No.143 of 2025 from the file of Sub Court, Omalur, Salem District, and transfer the same to the file of III Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai District.

¶3The petitioner is the wife. The respondent is the husband. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 19.11.2023 at Sri Ulaganayako Sametha Sri Ulageswarar Temple Desavilakku Village, Omalur Mandabam, Salem as per Hindue rites and customs and out of the wedlock, a male child is born, who is stated to be two years old and is in care and custody of the petitioner.

¶4The petitioner filed H.M.O.P. No.5381 of 2024 filed seeking Restitution of Conjugal Rights before the III Additional Family Court at Chennai and the same is pending. The respondent husband has also filed H.M.O.P. No.143 of 2025 before the Sub-Court, Omalur at Salem.

¶5The case of the petitioner/wife is that she is residing at Chennai along with minor child and aged parents. The petitioner pleads difficulty in travelling Page3 of 5 from Chennai to Salem for each hearing, particularly she has to take care of the minor child. Further, travel expenditure would cause hardship.

¶6Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the respondent.

¶7It is well settled that in transfer petitions arising out of matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife is a paramount consideration, particularly when she is residing away from the place where the matrimonial proceedings are instituted. When the wife pleads genuine difficulty on account of residence, take care of child and huge expenses spent for travel, the request ordinarily deserves acceptance, unless strong reasons exist to decline. The petitioner has also initiated HMOP before the III Additional Family Court at Chennai.

¶8In view of the above circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that ends of justice would be met by transferring HMOP No.143 of 2025 from the file of Sub Court, Omalur, Salem District to the file of III Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai District.

¶9Accordingly, Tr.C.M.P.No.1240 of 2025 is allowed. HMOP No.143 of 2025 on the file of Sub Court, Omalur, Salem District is withdrawn and Page4 of 5 transferred to the file of the III Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai District. The Sub Court, Omalur Salem District shall transmit the entire records to the III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai, within three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai shall dispose of the matter in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, uninfluenced by any observations made in this order. Interim stay granted by this Court on 17-11-2025 shall stand vacated and CMP.No.28391 of 2025 is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 05-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SHL To

¶1The Sub Court, Omalur, Salem District

¶2The III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai District. TRoCMPoNo.o1240oofo2025 DR.A.D.MARIAoCLETEoJ. SHL TRoCMPoNo.o1240oofo2025 AND CMPoNO.o28391oOFo2025 05-02-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and CMP NO. 28391 of 2025 B.Chandhana ..Petitioner Vs S.Prasanth ..Respondent Prayer in TR CMP No. 1240 of 2025: Petition filed under section 24 of CPC to withdraw the HMOP No.143 of 2025 on the file of Sub Court, Omalur in Salem District, and transfer the same to the file of Honble III Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai District. Prayer in CMP No. 28391 of 2025: Petition t o interim stay all further proceedings in HMOP No.143 of 2025 on the file of Sub Court Omalur in Salem District and pending disposal of the above Tr.CMP. For Petitioner: Mr.R. Balaji Singh For Respondent: No appearance Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.