VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Lakshmi v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by Its, the Principal Secretary,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 April 2026
Bench
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Case no.
HCP 2254/2025

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The mother of detenu - Manikandan @ Madasamy, S/o. Guna, aged 32 years, has filed this petition challenging detention order dated 11.08.2025 branding him as 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982).

¶2We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents.

3.We find on perusal of the record that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the sole ground that the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind. Page3 of 5

4.In paragraph no.4 of the grounds of detention, the detaining authority had stated that the detenu, who was in remand, had not filed any bail application and the relatives of the detenu were taking steps to file a bail application. The detaining authority had relied upon a statement of a relative to arrive at such a satisfaction.

5.Firstly, we find that the statement is said to have been made by the petitioner and that in the said statement, there is no reference to filing of the bail application in the ground case.

6.Secondly, this Court in HCP No.1684 of 2025, by the order dated

01.04.2026 had held that a statement recorded under Section 180(3) of BNSS, which does not require signature, is of no value and that only a signed statement of the relative would lend credence to the satisfaction of the detaining authority that the relative is taking steps to file a bail application and there is likelihood of the detenu being released on bail.

7.In the absence of any such statement, we are of the view that the inference of the detaining authority that the detenu is likely to be released on bail and thereafter, indulge in criminal activities, is without any basis. Hence, for both the reasons, the detention order is liable to be quashed.

8.In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in BBCDEFGISSSV No.554/2025 dated 11.08.2025 is set aside. Page4 of 5

9.The detenu, viz., Manikandan @ Madasamy, S/o. Guna, aged 32 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, is hereby directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 20-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order TSG Note: Issue order copy on 20.04.2026 To

¶1The State of Tamilnadu Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat Complex, Chennai - 600 009.

¶2The Commissioner Of Police, Office of Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai - 600 007.

¶3The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066.

¶4The Inspector of Police, K-11, CMBT Police Station, Thiruvallur District. HCPoNo.o2254oofo2025 DR.ANITAoSUMANTH,oJ. AND SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. TSG HCPoNo.o2254oofo2025 20-04-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Lakshmi W/o.Guna, 31, Stringer Street, Broadway, Chennai - 600 108. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat Complex, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai - 600 007. 3. The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. 4. The Inspector of Police, K-11, CMBT Police Station, Thiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ or a directing, calling for the records relating to the detention order in 554/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 Dated 11.08.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent Page2 of 5 under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Manikandan @ Madasamy, aged 32 years, S/o.Guna, who is presently confined in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Honble Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr. K. Selvamani for Ms.Vindhiya For Respondent(s): Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor, Asst. by Mr.M.Sylvester John

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.