Rajalakshmi v. Thiruvenkatesan,

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 05.03.2025 passed by the XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, in I.A. No. 9 of 2024 in O.S. No. 5988 of 2021.

¶2Under the aforesaid order, the application filed by the petitioners in I.A. No.9 of 2024, seeking to amend the plaint by including one more property as a suit schedule property has been rejected by the trial Court.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3, who are the contesting respondents in the suit, has now stated no objection for allowing the Civil Revision Petition, provided a direction is issued to the trial Court to dispose of the suit within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Respondents 4 and 5 are formal respondents and they may not have any objection for a direction to be issued by this Court to dispose of the suit within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶4Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition filed by the petitioner is allowed by setting aside the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by the XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, in I.A. No. 9 of 2024 in O.S. No. 5988 of 2021, by allowing the amendment in entirety as prayed for by the petitioner in I.A. No. 9 of 2024 in O.S. No. 5988 of 2021 pending on the file of the XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶5The respondents are also permitted to file additional written statements, if any, before the trial Court, in view of the amendment granted by this Court, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On completion of the pleadings and on framing of additional issues by the trial Court, the XV Additional City Civil Court is directed to dispose of the suit O.S. No. 5988 of 2021 within a period of eight months thereafter.

¶6Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12-06-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

¶1The XV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

2.The Sub Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai.

3.The District Registrar, North Chennai. CRPeNo.e6475eofe2025 ABDULoQUDDHOSEoJ. ab CRPoNo.o6475oofo2025 ANDoCMPoNO.o31998o OFo2025,CMPoNO.o 31994oOFo2025 12-06-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE AND CMP NO. 31998 OF 2025,CMP NO. 31994 OF 2025 1. Rajalakshmi 2. Varun Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Thiruvenkatesan, 2.Suresh Kumar 3.Ramya 4.The Sub Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai. 5.The District Registrar, North Chennai. Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order, rejecting to add the above said Vacant lands in the Schedule of the above Said Suit, Passed in IA No. 9 of 2024 in OS No. 5988 of 2021 dated 05.03.2025 on the file of the Learned XV Addl. City Civil Court Chennai in and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Karthikeyan For Respondent(s): M/S.A.Arafat Mohammed For R1 to R3 Mr.V.Balakrishnan,GA For R4 and R5