VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Soundarajan v. The Commissioner of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 June 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
WP Crl. 1317/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. Ilanthiraiyan

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to take possession of the property comprised in Survey No.709/2, situated at Madambakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District, as per the order passed by the third respondent dated 06.06.2025. Page3 of 6

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶3The petitioner's paternal grandfather, viz., K.Ekambaram, was working as a Jamedor in Indian Military during the British period. He was granted temporary assignment patta for the property to an extent of 5 acres by order dated 29.06.1920. Subsequently, the same was classified and confirmed by the third respondent. The petitioner and others, being legal heirs of the said Ekambaram, were in possession and enjoyment of the same. In the meanwhile, the respondents 4 to 8 encroached the said property and as such, the petitioner could not able to take possession of the subject property. Hence, the petitioner submitted a representation seeking police protection to take possession of the subject property.

¶4Though the petitioner's grandfather was assigned the subject land and the same was confirmed by the third respondent, the private persons have now encroached the subject property. In order to evict them, the petitioner sought for police protection. However, the police protection cannot be granted for the simple reason that the private persons are in occupation of the land Page4 of 6 which was originally assigned in favour of the petitioner's grandfather. Therefore, the petitioner ought to have approached the Civil Court for appropriate relief against the persons who have illegally occupied the property, in the manner known to law.

¶5In view of the above, the representation submitted by the petitioner cannot be considered. Thus, the writ petition lacks merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands dismissed. 11-06-2026 (2/2) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order LPP To

¶1The Commissioner of Police O/o The Commissioner of Police, W62 FH5V, ELCOT SEZ, Karappakkam, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600119.

¶2The Inspector of Police (Law & Order) S.15, Selaiyur Police Station, East Tamabaram, Chennai-600073. Page5 of 6

3.The Tahsildar O/o The Tahisldar, Tambaram Town and Taluk. Chengalpattu District, Chennai-600045.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page6 of 6 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J. LPP 11-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN S.Soundarajan S/o. Late. Saravanan, 1/521, Sunnambu Kolathur Main Road, Periyakovilam Pakkam Village and Post, Chengalpattu District-600117. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police O/o The Commissioner of Police, W62 FH5V, ELCOT SEZ, Karappakkam, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600119. 2. The Inspector of Police (Law & Order) S.15, Selaiyur Police Station, East Tamabaram, Chennai-600073. 3. The Tahsildar O/o The Tahisldar, Tambaram Town and Taluk. Chengalpattu District, Chennai-600045. 4. K.Jayabal 5. S.Ravikumar 6. G.Srinivasan Page2 of 6 7. Water Raja 8. Samson (R4 to R8 impleaded as respondents vide order dated 11.06.2026 made in WPMP Crl.No.735 of 2025 in W.P.Crl.No.1317 of 2025) ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1 and 2 respondents herein to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner after fix the date and time for taking possession of his land properties in Survey No.709/2 situated in Madambakkam Village and Post, located in Tamabram Taluk, Chengalpattu District and as per the 3rd respondent is proceedings vide Na.Ka.No.346/2025 dated 06.06.2025 after considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.10.2025. For Petitioner : Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy For Respondents: Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.