VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ms Sns Movies Productions Llp v. Mr Manjunath

DECREE IN TERMS OF MEMO OF COMPROM
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 February 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
C.S(COMM DIV) 283/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Judgment

JUDGMENT The suit was filed for remedies in respect of alleged infringement of trade mark and passing off. The plaintiff's mark is Page3 of 5 and the defendant's mark is

¶2Mr.S.Manjunath, proprietor of the defendant, has filed undertaking affidavit affirmed on 23.02.2026. In such affidavit, he has undertaken to permanently cease and desist from using the impugned mark THINK STUDIO or any mark identical or deceptively similar thereto. He has also undertaken to withdraw trade mark application No.6972552 immediately and to make changes to domain names, URL, Instagram accounts and accounts on other social media platforms. In paragraph 8 of the undertaking affidavit, the defendant has requested for the following limited exemption "8. I categorically undertake that upon completion of the aforesaid two-month period (i.e., on or before

10.04.2026), no use whatsoever of the impugned mark THINK STUDIO shall subsist, either directly or indirectly, in physical form, digital form or in any other manner."

¶3Subject to the above limited exemption, learned counsel for the defendant submits that a decree may be issued in terms of clauses (a) and (b) of paragraph 38 of the plaint. Learned counsel for the plaintiff agrees to give up claims in terms of clauses (c) and (d) of paragraph 38. Page4 of 5

¶4Therefore, the suit is decreed in terms of clauses (a) and (b) of paragraph 38 of the plaint subject to the defendant being permitted to use the mark THINK STUDIO up to 09.04.2026 solely for auditing, administrative and allied compliance purposes. In view of the settlement, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected applications are closed. 23-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RNA Page5 of 5

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA and O.A.Nos.1059 & 1060 of 2025 and A.No.5555 of 2025 23-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and O.A.Nos.1059 & 1060 of 2025 and A.No.5555 of 2025 M/s.SNS Movies Productions LLP Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.Shyam Sundar Ravichandran No 25 Mamatha Complex, 5th Floor, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Mr.Manjunath Sole Proprietor of THINK STUDIO Having Office at No.725, Lalabagathurshasthiri Street, Konavattam, Vellore, Tamil Nadu-632013 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Read With Order IV Rule 1 of High Court O.S Rules and Section 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying the judgment and decree as follows:- (a) Granting a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their men, servants or anyone claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff trade mark and trading style THINK STUDIOS by using Page2 of 5 the offending trade mark and trading style THINK STUDIO or any other mark or marks which are similar or in any way deceptively similat to or a colorable imitation of the plaintiff's trade mark. (b) Granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their men, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under them from in any manner passing off the plaintiff trade mark and trading style THINK STUDIOS by using the offending trade mark and trading style THINK STUDIO or any other mark or marks which are similar or in any way deceptively similar to or a colorable imitation of the plaintiff's trade mark. (c) Directing to the defendant to disclose accounts of profits and render accounts of income earned using the infringing mark, for the purposes of assessment of damages and for such damages to be awarded to the plaintiff. (d) For costs of the suit. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Vijayan Subramanian For Respondent(s): Ms.R.Rachana

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.