Kartheeswari.A v. The Secretary to Government

__________Page 1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP Nos. 44441 and 44446 OF 2025 and WMP.Nos. 49560, 49562, 49564, 49573, 49574 & 49577 of 2025 W.P.No.44441 of 2025 Kartheeswari.A ..Petitioner(s) Vs

¶1The Secretary To Government, Home(Pol.II) Department Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600009. Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Complex, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner Of Police Complex, ..Respondent(s) WP No. 44446 of 2025 Kottaieswari.P ..Petitioner(s) Vs.

¶1The Secretary to Government, Home(Pol.II) Department Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600009. __________Page 2 of 6 Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner Of Police Complex, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner Of Police Complex, ..Respondent(s) Prayer in W.P.No.44441 of 2025: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd Respondent pertaining to the Final selection list for the post of Sub-Inspectors of police and Station Officers (Tamilnadu Fire Subordinate Services) published on 27.10.2025 and quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd Respondent to re-select the candidates in a transparent manner and in accordance with the stipulations imposed by this Honble Court. Prayer in W.P.No.44446 of 2025: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, call for the records of the 2nd Respondent pertaining to the final selection list for the post of Sub-Inspectors of Police Station Officer in the (Tamilnadu Fire Subordinate Services) published on 27.10.2025 and quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd Respondent to re-select the candidates in a transparent manner and in accordance with the stipulations imposed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): in both petitions Ms.R.Revathy For Respondent(s): in both petitions Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Govt. Pleader for R1 __________Page 3 of 6 Mr.P.Kumaresan Additional Advocate General assisted by Ms.D.Sowmi Dattan for R2 & R3 Common Order These writ petitions have been filed challenging the Final selection list for the post of Sub-Inspectors of police and Station Officers (Tamilnadu Fire Subordinate Services) published on 27.10.2025 and quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd Respondent to re-select the candidates in a transparent manner and in accordance with the stipulations imposed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶2Heard, Ms.R.Revathy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.P.Balathandayutham, learned Special Government Pleader for R1 and Mr.P.Kumaresan, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Ms.D.Sowmi Dattan for R2 & R3.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the participated in the recruitment for the post of Sub-Inspector of Police pursuant to the Notification No.1 of 2023 dated 23.05.2023 under the category of MBC-Women. However, it is the grievance of the petitioners that persons, who __________Page 4 of 6 secured lesser marks than the petitioners were selected in the provisional list. Challenging the same, the present writ petition is filed.

¶4Per contra, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents would submit that the entire selection was made by the Judicial Committee appointed by this Court in W.P.Nos. 32347 of 2024 etc., batch dated

22.04.2025. As against the said order, an appeal filed in W.A.No.2552 of 2025 was dismissed by the Division Bench by its order dated 08.10.2025 wherein, the Division Bench has issued a direction to publish the result. Pursuant to the said direction, the result was published whereby, the petitioner in W.P.No.44446 of 2025 secured 75.75 marks and the petitioner in W.P.No.44441 of 2025 has secured 75.50 marks whereas the cut off marks for MBC-Women has been fixed as 76 and, if at all the petitioner has any grievance, the petitioner has to challenge the Judicial Committee report or impleading themselves in the appropriate manner. He would also submit that the respondents have no part in the entire selection process, since the same was made by the Judicial Committee. Accordingly, he prayed for appropriate orders.

¶5In view of the same, these writ petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to workout their remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. The respondents are directed to publish the Judicial Committee report in the official website of __________Page 5 of 6 the respondents within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to enable the petitioners to access the same. 22-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Note: Issue order copy on 29.01.2026. To

¶1The Secretary To Government, Home(Pol.II) Department Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600009. Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Complex, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner Of Police Complex, __________Page 6 of 6 M.DHANDAPANI J. KKN WP Nos. 44441 & 44446 of 2025 22-01-2026