- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 7428/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by her, based on her online application dated 28.05.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.The petitioner had submitted her online application dated 28.05.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.Mr.C.Gowtham Raj, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.V.Mehanathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the second respondent. Since no adverse order is being passed against respondents 3 and 4, notice to respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with.
4.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's online application.
5.No prejudice will be caused to the first respondent if the said authority is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from respondents 3 and 4 as well as any other party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to respondents 3 and 4 and also to any other party, whom the first respondent deems it fit to put on notice.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the first respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the first respondent, the second respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 02-03-2026 vga To
1.The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem district
2.The Inspector of Police Veeraganur police station, Salem district ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga
02-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Sangeetha Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem district 2.The Inspector of Police Veeraganur police station, Salem district 3.S.Suriyakumar 4.S.Anandkumar Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the 1st respondent to survey the petitioner Agriculture land with the held of the 2nd respondent and comprised in Survey Nos. 18/2C and 20/1A and Patta No. 19 and fixed the boundary stone four side of the petitioner property situated at Veppampoondi village, Thalaivasal Taluk, and Salem district and fix the foundry stones in the said survey numbers and by passing order petitioner online payment and E-Challan dated 28.05.2025. For Petitioner: Mr.T.Velu For Respondents: Mr.C.Goutham Raj, Government Advocate for R1 Mr.V.Mehanathan, Government Advocate (crl.side) for R2 Notice dispensed with for R3 and 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.