- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 April 2026
- Bench
- Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
- Case no.
- HCP 2494/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Anita SumanthFollow Sunder Mohan
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The mother of the detenu – Sujith S/o.Dhakshinamurthy, aged 20 years, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 04.09.2025, branding him as 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982).
¶2We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents. Page3 of 6
¶3Though several grounds have been raised, we are of the view that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind.
¶4The detaining authority has relied upon a statement said to have been made by the mother of the detenu, under Section 180(3) of the BNSS that she is taking steps to file a bail application in the ground case. However, we find that the statement of the mother of the detenu is unsigned. We have in HCP No. 1684 of 2025 vide order dated 01.04.2026, held that, the unsigned statement cannot be relied upon to infer that the detenu is likely to file bail application.
¶5Therefore, the reliance placed on the said statement by the detaining authority to arrive at the satisfaction that there is a real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail is misconceived. Thus, the inference that the detention is warranted since the detenu is likely to indulge in further criminal activities after his release on bail is based on the said wrong premise. Hence, the detention order is liable to be quashed.
¶6In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in No.645/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 04.09.2025 is set aside. Page4 of 6
¶7The detenu, viz., Sujith, S/o.Dhakshinamurthy, aged 20 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, is hereby directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 29-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Note: Issue order today dk Copy to:
¶1The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
¶2The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai.
¶3The Superintendent of Police, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.
¶4The Inspector of Police, E2 Royapettah Police Station, Chennai. Page5 of 6
¶5The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai.
¶6The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. HCPoNo.2494oofo2025 DR.ANITAoSUMANTH,oJ. AND SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. dk HCPoNo.o2494oofo2025 29-04-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN HCP No. 2494 of 2025 D.Porselvi W/o.Dhakshinamoorthy No.48 PM Dhargah 2nd Street, Triplicane, Chennai-600 005. ...Petitioner/Detenu's Mother Vs 1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. 4. The Inspector of Police, E2 Royapettah Police Station, Chennai. ...Respondents Page2 of 6 Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in No.645/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025, dated 04.09.2025 and quash the same as illegal and produce the detenu, namely Sujith S/o.Dhakshinamurthy, aged 20 years GOONDA, now he is confined in Central Prison, Puzhal II, Chennai before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner: Mr. C.Vignesh For Respondents: Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.