VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Senthil Kumar .M v. State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police,

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 February 2026
Bench
Sunder Mohanauthor
Case no.
CRL MP 523/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Sunder Mohan

Judgment

O R D E R This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment dated 14.10.2022 passed in Spl.S.C.No.20 of 2021 by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode, pending disposal of the above criminal appeal, and to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶2The petitioner/Accused in Spl.S.C.No.20 of 2021 was convicted by the Trial Court by judgment dated 14.10.2022, for the following offence: Conviction under Sections Sentence awarded 5(l), 5(m) punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 To undergo rigorous imprisonment for twenty years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

¶3Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has preferred Crl.A.No.714 of 2024 before this Court along with the instant criminal miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence and bail.

¶4The case of the prosecution is that on 27.02.2020 and on several other occasions, the petitioner committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl, aged about 7 years, and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there exists a property dispute between PW1, the mother of the victim, and the petitioner; that the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 27.02.2020; that the victim was examined on the very next day; that the medical evidence does not disclose any external injuries; and that the complaint is an afterthought. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody from 14.10.2022 and was in custody during the course of investigation.

¶6Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the conviction is based on the cogent and testimony of the victim and that no case has been made out for suspension of sentence.

¶7It is seen that the victim was medically examined on 28.02.2020. The Doctor (PW8), in her evidence, has stated that no external injuries were noted at the time of examination. The conviction is primarily based on the testimony of the victim. This Court has to therefore examine whether the conviction can be sustained on the basis of the sole testimony of the victim in the light of the medical evidence.

¶8Considering the above facts and the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 14.10.2022, and since the appeal is not likely to be taken up for hearing in the near future, this Court is inclined to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal.

¶9Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands allowed and the sentence imposed on the petitioner is suspended till the disposal of the above criminal appeal and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on the following conditions:

(i)The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode;

(ii)The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book and mobile numbers to ensure their identity; and

(iii)The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until the disposal of the appeal and if he is not able to appear before the Trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the Trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the Trial Court.

17.02.2026 cda To

1.The Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode.

2.The Inspector of Police, Gopichettipalayam Police Station, Erode District.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.M.P.No.523oofo2026 inoCrl.A.No.714oofo2024 SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. cda Crl.M.P.No.523oofo2026 inoCrl.A.No.714oofo2024

17.02.2026 ooooooooo 6o/o6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.A.No.714 of 2024 Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Gopichettipalayam Police Station, Erode District. (Crime No.01 of 2020) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS, praying to suspend the sentence in judgment of conviction dated 14.10.2022 passed in Spl.S.C.No.20 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode, and enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the above criminal appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Silambu Selvan For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.