VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Padmanaban v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 February 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 46400/2025

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed for the following relief: "To direct the respondents, their men, subordinates or any person claiming under them from in any manner carrying / permitting any mining activity in S.No.109, "Hamsastha Malai" in Thiruvahindrapuram village, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore."

¶2The petitioner would submit that he and his brothers are owners of lands situate at New S.No.108/2 Hec. 1.15.0 and New S.No.108/4 Hec. 2.88.0 in Thiruvahindrapuram Village, Cuddalore Taluk. There are more than 3000 cashew trees in the aforesaid properties and they are all aged about 60 years.

¶3In the year 2009, respondents 1 and 3 issued a tender to mine sand, to bring down the lateral sand in the hill portion. Thereafter, the petitioner and his brothers filed O.S.79 of 2009, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore, against respondents 1 to 3 herein and 2 others who had been given the right to mine / excavate the hill. The suit was decreed in their favour and an appeal filed by private respondents in A.S.No.69 of 2010 was partly allowed. The Judgment and decree in the suit and appeal have become final.

¶4The petitioner would submit that for the past 2 to 3 years, hillocks around village have been disappearing. The destruction / excavation is not being done legally or by following law. Thereafter, the petitioner made a complaint before respondents 1 and 2. However, all of a sudden demolition commenced on 04.11.2025. Thereafter, the petitioner sent a representation dated 05.11.2025 to respondents. The petitioner would submit that the official respondents are openly supporting such act. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶5The 1st respondent has filed a counter affidavit, wherein in paragraph Nos.11 and 12, they have stated as follows: "11.Accordingly, a joint inspection was conducted by the Revenue and Geology & Minding Officials, during which it was reported by the concerned officials that no minding or excavation activity was being carried out during inspection in S.F.No.109/1 or in SF.Nos.108/2 and 108/4, which are patta lands belonging to the petitioner's brother Thiru.Devanathan. The petitioner's easementary right, as recognized by the competent Civil Court, remains unaffected.

12.In the above said circumstances, this respondent respectfully undertakes before this Hon'ble Court that no illegal mining shall be permitted in the subject area and that periodical inspections will be conducted to prevent any kind of illegal mining in the locality.

¶6Recording the above, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

06.02.2026

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan To

1.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore-607001.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddalore-607001.

3.The Assistant Director of Mines, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District.

4.The Tahsildar, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore-607001

5.The Village Administrative Officer, Thiruvendhipuram, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District P.T. ASHA, J

kan

06.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 06.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 46400 of 2025 & W.M.P.No. 51750 of 2025 R.Padmanaban ...petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore-607001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddalore-607001. 3.The Assistant Director of Mines, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District. 4.The Tahsildar, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore-607001 5.The Village Administrative Officer, Thiruvendhipuram, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents, their men, subordinates or any person claiming under them from in any manner carrying / permitting any mining activity in S.No.109, "Hamsastha Malai" in Thiruvahindrapuram village, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore. For petitioner : Mr. D.Baskar For Respondents : Mr. Stalin Abhimanyu Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.