VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Nakka Naga Thirumala v. State of Tamilnadu, Rep by Intelligence Officer,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 25/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

07.05.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 28 and 29 of NDPS Act in R.R. No.16 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 4

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused transported 216 kgs of brownish green colour dry leaves and flowering tops believed to be Ganja concealed in a white colour Ashok Leyland vehicle bearing Registration No.AP16 TF 3401 on 05.05.2025. Hence the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent, she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is under incarceration since 07.05.2025 and the earlier bail applications filed by the petitioner before this Hon'ble Court and before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Special Court under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai were dismissed vide orders dated 04.11.2025 and 19.06.2025 respectively. There are change of circumstances. Charge sheet has also been filed. He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police strongly opposed to enlarge the petitioner on bail, the respondent police have recovered 216 kgs of Ganja from the petitioner and other accused and the same would come under the commercial quantity. Therefore, there is bar under Section 37(1)(2)(b) of NDPS Act. Page3 of 4

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.

¶6From the submissions made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor that commercial quantity of contraband has been seized from the petitioner, this Court could not find any reason to overcome the rigors under Section 37 of NDPS Act. In view of the same, it is not desirable to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 12-03-2026 MJS Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶2The Intelligence Officer, NCB Police Station, Chennai District. CRLoOPoNo.o25oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. MJS CRLoOPoNo.o25oofo2026 12-03-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Nakka Naga Thirumala D/o. Ramanjanagyro, Veerapannigumed, Gannava Ram Manpac Krisutna, Andhra Pradesh. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Intelligence Officer, NCB Police Station, Chennai District. [R.R. No.16 of 2025] ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused-2 on bail in RR No.16/2025 on the file of the Intelligence officer, NCB, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): M/s.I.Jagadeesan For Respondent(s): Mr N.P. Kumar, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [FOR NCB CASES]

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.