Priyanga v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on Page2 of 5

14.07.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29(1) of NDPS Act in Cr. No.143 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused have involved in illegal sale of Ganja near Gandhi Nagar Bus Depot, Adyar. Total contraband seized from the accused is 26 kgs. Hence the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent, she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that even according to the prosecution, 11 kgs of Ganja has been recovered from the petitioner, which is not a commercial quantity. The petitioner is under incarceration since 14.07.2025 and the earlier bail applications filed by the petitioner were dismissed and there are change of circumstances. Charge sheet has also been filed. He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶4The said contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has been strongly opposed by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police stating that total quantity involved in this Page3 of 5 case is a commercial quantity and the petitioner is having one previous case registered in Rajamundry Policec Station Cr. No.25 of 2023 under Sections 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act and in that case also, commercial quantity of contraband has been involved.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.

¶6Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate that commercial quantity of contraband involved in this case and taking into consideration the bad antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that there is no merits in the petition. In view of the same, it is not desirable to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 12-03-2026 [1/2] MJS Page4 of 5 Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶2The Inspector of Police, PEW-Adyar Police Station, Chennai. CRLoOPoNo.o101oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. MJS CRLoOPoNo.o101oofo2026 12-03-2026 [1/2] Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Priyanga D/o. Mari, No.595, 18th Block, Nagoor Garden, New Washermenpet, Tandaiyarpet, Chennai-21. Now resding at Krishna Nagar, Nappalayam, Chennai-93. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police, PEW-Adyar Police Station, Chennai. [Crime No.143 of 2025] ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the Petitioner on Bail pending investigation in the above C.C. No.1353 of 2025, by the Respondent police filed before the Hon'ble I Additional EC and NDPS Court at Chennai. For Petitioner(s): M/s.P.Santhosh For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)