K.Pakiyam v. The Superintendent of Central Prison for Women,

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking an order that the sentence imposed vide judgment dated 19.01.2023 in C.C.No.295 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai (FAC), (for short Page2 of 6 "Madurai NDPS Court") shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed vide judgment dated 27.05.2022 in C.C.No.4 of 2018 on the file of Special Judge, I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the NDPS Act, Chennai, (for short "Chennai NDPS Court"), by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2025

¶2The submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner are as follows:

2.1 The petitioner, who is a lady was arrested in R.R.No.10 of 2017 – In NCB.F.No. 48/1/5/2017-NCB/MDS registered by the NCB, Chennai, on

25.07.2017. The NCB, Chennai, after completing the investigation, filed a final report which was taken up as C.C. No.4 of 2018 on the file of the Chennai NDPS Court. After a full-fledged trial, the Chennai NDPS Court, vide judgment dated 27.05.2022, convicted and sentenced the petitioner as follows: Provision under which convicted Sentence Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act 10 years RI and fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default, RI for three months Section 8(c) r/w 25 of NDPS Act 10 years RI and fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default, RI for three months

2.2 Meanwhile, when she was in remand in the aforesaid case, she was arrested on PT warrant in a case in Crime No.57 of 2016 registered by NIBCID, Madurai. Page3 of 6

2.3 After completion of investigation, the NIBCID, Madurai, filed a final report before the Madurai NDPS Court and the case was taken up for trial in C.C.No.295 of 2016. After a full-fledged trial, the petitioner, by judgment dated 19.01.2023 was found guilty and was convicted and sentenced as follows: Provision under which convicted Sentence Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)

(B) of NDPS Act 3 years RI and fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, SI for two weeks

2.4 The petitioner was throughout in jail and she faced trial. The Madurai NDPS Court, while convicting the petitioner in C.C.No.295 of 2016 ought to have ordered that the sentence in the said case should run concurrently with the earlier sentence imposed by the Chennai NDPS Court in C.C.No.4 of 2018. However, the Madurai NDPS Court did not do so and hence, the petitioner is unable to come out on bail, despite the sentence imposed by the Chennai NDPS Court having been suspended by this Court vide order dated

25.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.14573 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.398 of 2023.

¶3Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner was in judicial custody from

25.07.2017 and she faced trial in both the cases while undergoing incarceration. Page4 of 6

¶4Heard Mr.R.Sankara Subbu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Santhosh, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶5Admittedly, the petitioner had been in prison from 25.07.2017 and she was convicted by the Chennai NDPS Court in C.C.No.4 of 2018 on

27.05.2022 and sentenced as set out in paragraph 2.1 supra. Subsequently, she was convicted by the Madurai NDPS Court in C.C.No.295 of 2016 on

19.01.2023 and sentenced as set out in paragraph 2.3 supra.

¶6As rightly argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Madurai NDPS Court ought to have exercised its discretion and ordered that the sentence imposed in C.C.No.295 of 2016 on its file should run concurrently with the sentence imposed by the Chennai NDPS Court in C.C.No.4 of 2018, which has not been done.

¶7Hence, by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this Court orders that the sentence in C.C.No.295 of 2016 imposed by the Madurai NDPS Court on 19.01.2023 shall run concurrently with the earlier sentence imposed by the Chennai NDPS Court in C.C.No.4 of 2018 on 27.05.2022. Page5 of 6

¶8Now that the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently, the respondent shall take into consideration the period of imprisonment undergone by the petitioner and pass orders accordingly by considering her representation within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. 30-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Note: Issue order copy on 03.02.2026 To

¶1The I Additional Special Judge for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the NDPS Act, Chennai

¶2The I Additional Special Judge for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai

¶3The Superintendent of Central Prison for Women Puzhal Chennai 600 006

¶4The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court Chennai 600 104 CRLoOPoNo.o33563oofo2025 A.D.JAGADISHoCHANDIRA,oJ. KKN CRLoOPoNo.o33563oofo2025 30-01-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA K.Pakiyam ..Petitioner Vs The Superintendent of Central Prison for Women, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking to pass an order to run concurrently the judgement in C.C.No.295 of 2016 dated 19.01.2023 on the file of I-Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases Madurai (FAC) with the judgement in C.C.No.4 of 2018 dated 27.05.2022 on the file of Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai by considering the representation dated 29.11.2025 to secure the ends of justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)