VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Fathima Begam v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 March 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 7001/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.01.2025 to provide NOC to obtain electricity connection to the property situated at T.S.No.2034, Thenkasi Road, Old Ward -8/New Ward-Ae, Block-14, Kandiyaperi-2, Palayapettai, Thirunelveli, Thirunelveli-627 008.

¶2The petitioner claiming that she has been in occupation of the subject property for more than 100 years, applied for electricity service connection for cattle shed attaching NOC issued by the owner of the property, namely, Miyasa Pallivasal. However, the application was rejected on the ground that the petitioner has not produced NOC from the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board. The petitioner relies on the order passed by this Court in similar nature in W.P.No.6734 of 2018. The petitioner has earlier filed a writ petition in W.P.No.3747 of 2024 for a direction to the respondents to consider her representation dated 22.10.2024 to provide EB connection to the property which was disposed of on 19.11.2024, directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.10.2024. Since the same was not Page3 of 5 complied with, the petitioner filed a contempt petition in Cont.P.No.2048 of 2024 and only thereafter, the second respondent passed an order on 22.06.2025, rejecting the petitioner's representation. Thereafter, the petitioner has sent a representation on 10.01.2025 to the respondent to get NOC to the land to which she requires electricity connection. Since the same was not considered till date, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reiterated the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and sought for aforesaid relief.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the subject property belonged to the respondent and the petitioner has no right over the property and her remedy is available only before the Wakf Tribunal and not before this Court.

¶5Admittedly, the petitioner has not enclosed any document to substantiate her possession and title. That apart, she has only enclosed some receipts showing payment of tax. In view of the explanation appended to Rule Page4 of 5 27(4) of the Distribution Code, unless the possession is legal, person in possession of the property cannot obtain electricity connection. Therefore, the petitioner has to necessarily prove her possession and obtain NOC from the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, for which, she has to approach the Wakf Tribunal in the manner known to law.

¶6Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

02.03.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssb To The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Represented by its Chef Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai-600 001. Page5 of 5

M.DHANDAPANI, J. ssb W.P.No.7001 of 2026

02.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.7001 of 2026 S.Fathima Begam ...Petitioner Vs The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Represented by its Chef Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai-600 001. ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.01.2025 to provide NOC to provide electricity connection to the property situated at T.S.No.2034, Thenkasi Road, Old Ward -8/New Ward-Ae, Block-14, Kandiyaperi-2, Palayapettai, Thirunelveli, Thirunelveli-627 008. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jaisingh For Respondent : Mr.Haja Mohideen Gisthi Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.