VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.G.Nayaz v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 July 2026
Bench
G. Jayachandran, S Justice N. Mala
Case no.
WP 49183/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G. JayachandranFollow S Justice N. Mala

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.Jayachandran J.) This petition is filed seeking a mandamus to consider the representation of the petitioner to remove the encroachments made in public pathway falling under TSLR Nos.81 to 110 of Singaravelu Mudaliar Street, Block No.55, Ward-B, Hosur Town, Krishnagiri District.

¶2It is alleged that the fifth respondent herein is misusing his power as a past Member of Legislative Assembly and sitting Member of Parliament.

¶3The counter filed by the District Collector – first respondent indicates that Town Survey Nos.81 and 251 are currently classified as "Government Poramboke – Santhu/Street", whereas Town Survey No.110 is a patta land of the fifth respondent.

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that till the year 2006, the land in Town Survey No.110 was classified as "Gramanatham" and, all-of-a-sudden, the revenue records have been altered as if the said land is a patta land of the fifth respondent. It is further stated that earlier when action was taken by the Municipality for evicting the encroachment in Town Survey Page3 of 5 Nos.81 and 251, that was challenged before the High Court and, in view of the procedural lapses, the Writ Petitions were allowed. It is also submitted that the Municipality is now contemplating to issue fresh show cause notice to those encroachers for eviction.

¶5Learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State, has produced 'A' Register extract and Adangal in respect of the property now in Town Survey No.110 and the extract indicates that only after the year 2006, the Gramanatham land, measuring 22 cents, has been shown as patta land of the fifth respondent and earlier it was shown as "Arasu Poramboke – Gramanatham" land.

¶6From the facts and records, it is necessary to ascertain how patta was assigned to the fifth respondent in respect of Gramanatham land to an extent of 22 cents. Therefore, the first respondent – District Collector is hereby directed to cause notice to the fifth respondent for production of documents as to how patta was assigned to him and whether the patta claimed by him is a genuine patta assigned to him following due process. The exercise of verifying the genuineness of the patta held by the fifth respondent is to be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶7It is also brought to our notice that Town Survey Nos.81 and 251 are also Government Poramboke lands and presently in occupation of the fifth respondent, but no action has been taken by the local body for eviction, despite an abortive attempt was made earlier by the authorities. Hence, the authorities Page4 of 5 are directed to proceed in accordance with law for evicting the occupants in Town Survey Nos.81 and 251.

¶8With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. (G.J.,J.) (N.M.,J.) 24-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order DIXIT To

¶1The District Collector Krishnagiri District.

¶2The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

¶3The Sub Collector Hosur, Krishnagiri District-635 109.

¶4The Commissioner Hosur Municipal Corporation, Hosur, Krishnagiri District-635 109. WPoNo.o49183oofo2025 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,oJ. AND N.MALA,oJ. DIXIT WPoNo.49183oofo2025 24-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA WP No.49183 of 2025 S.G.Nayaz ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District. 2. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Sub Collector Hosur, Krishnagiri District- 635 109. 4. The Commissioner Hosur Municipal Corporation, Hosur, Krishnagiri District- 635 109. 5. Thiru.K.Gopinath ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : To direct the respondents No.1 to 4 to consider the representation, dated 29.07.2025, made by the petitioner herein for removal of encroachments made in the public pathway by the 5th respondent commencing from TSLR No.81, Singaravelu Mudaliar Street, Block No.55, Ward-B, Hosur Town, reaching to TSLR No.110 at Nethaji Road, Hosur Town, Krishnagiri District. Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Ramamurthy For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Surendar, Govt. Advocate for RR1 TO 3 Mr.T.Balaji for R4 Mr.S.Mukunth, Senior Advocate, for M/S.Sarvabhauman Associates for R5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.