VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tata Capital Ltd v. Vijayakumara G P

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 July 2026
Bench
K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
Arb Appln 1705/2025

Judgment

O R D E R This application has been filed to direct the respondent to furnish security for a sum of Rs.15,69,709/- within the time stipulated by this Court failing which to pass an order directing the Garnishee to deduct and deposit the amount payable to the respondent towards salary and also direct the Garnishee to deposit the amount to the credit of this application.

¶2Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel, who appeared on behalf of the respondent, would submit that the respondent had taken back the bundle along with change of vakalat from him. However, the respondent, who had filed a counter, had not taken any steps to engage a counsel and file the change of vakalat on his behalf.

¶3This Court during the earlier hearing on 01.07.2026 had directed the respondent to furnish security by considering the fact that in the counter filed, no reasons have been given as to why he is not required to furnish security, that too in a post-award application. In spite of which, the respondent's conduct is delaying compliance with the order dated 01.07.2026. It is only a dilatory tactics adopted by him. Page3 of 4

¶4In such view of the matter, there shall be a direction to the Garnishee to deduct a sum of Rs.15,000/-, which this Court arrives by considering the salary slip (Pay slip for the month of March 2024), which indicates that the total payable gross salary of the respondent is Rs.90,636/- in which a deduction of Rs.28,551/- is being made and net salary is only Rs.62,085/-. The said sum of Rs.15,000/- is arrived at in view of the restriction placed under Section 18 of the Code of Wages, 2019. On deducting the said amount, the Garnishee/second respondent shall pay the said amount of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) to the applicant.

¶5With the aforesaid order, this application stands disposed of. 29-07-2026 Maya Page4 of 4

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Maya 29-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Tata Capital Ltd By its Associate Legal Remedial R.Kamalakkannan Having its office at 1st floor, Centennial Square, 6A - Dr Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam Chennai – 600 024. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Vijayakumara G P ...Respondent(s) 2. The Authorised Officer Salary - Disbursal Dept for Vijayakumar G.P. Lecturer, Pu Pre University Board, Government of Karnataka KGIDF NO./Metal/No.263 949 GPF/PRAN No.110033395160AG Shikaripura, Shimoga, 577 215 Karnataka District. ..Garnishee Prayer : To direct the Respondent to furnish security for a sum of Rs.15,69,709/- within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court failing which to pass an order directing the Garnishee to deduct and deposit the amount payable to the Respondent towards salary and also direct the Garnishee to deposit the amount to the credit of this application. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.K.Vanan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.P.Saravanan Page2 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.