Jothi v. The State Reresented by

ORDER Asserting that the petitioner is the owner of the immovable property described in paragraph 3 of the affidavit, the petitioner submitted a representation to the registering officer to cancel sale deed in favour of the sixth respondent. The present writ petition relates thereto.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sale deed in favour of the sixth respondent was registered without examining whether the executant was entitled to do so and without taking note of Will dated 02.09.2004. Therefore, he submits that the sale deed in favour of the sixth respondent is liable to be cancelled.

¶3Mr. Stalin Abhimanyu, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for respondents 1 to 5. He submits that the representation of the petitioner pertains to cancellation of the sale deed, and that the registering officer does not have the power to cancel the sale deed. He also points out that the petitioner was informed that the registering officer does not have the power of cancellation under communications issued on 29.05.2025 and 20.06.2025.

¶4As submitted by learned Additional Government Pleader, the registering officer does not have the power to cancel a registration. The Page4 of 6 petitioner asserts that title to the property vests in the petitioner on the basis of Will dated 04.09.1997. Evidently, the 6th respondent asserts a rival claim. Therefore, disputed questions pertaining to title arise for consideration and these matters cannot be appropriately addressed in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner appears prima facie to be within the period of limitation. Leaving it open to the petitioner to approach a jurisdictional civil court for relief, the writ petition stands disposed of without any order as to costs. 10-02-2026 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No kj Page5 of 6 To

¶1The State represented by The Inspector General of Registration, The Register Head office, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Santhome, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 028.

2.The Deputy Registrar, Jt.II Sub Registrar office No.5, Kesavan nagar, Thirupapuliyur, Cuddalore 607 002.

3.The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar's office, Pudupettai, Arasur Main road, Near Police Station, Pudupettai 607 108.

4.The District Collector The Cuddalore office, PB No.27, Second Floor, Room no.307, Collector office road, Dhanalakshmi Nagar Extension, Tamil nadu 607 001.

5.The District Registrar The Cuddalore DRO office, Sub Jail road, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu 607 001. WPoNo.o956oofo2026 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. KJ WPoNo.o956oofo2026 10-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Jothi W/o. Jothinathan, No.293-2, Kaliyamman Kovil Street, Oraiyur post, Oraiyur, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu 607 108. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The State represented by The Inspector General of Registration, The Register Head office, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Santhome, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 028. 2. The Deputy Registrar, Jt.II Sub Registrar office No.5, Kesavan nagar, Thirupapuliyur, Cuddalore 607 002. 3. The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar's office, Pudupettai, Arasur Main road, Near Police Station, Pudupettai 607 108. Page2 of 6 4. The District Collector The Cuddalore office, PB No.27, Second Floor, Room no.307, Collector office road, Dhanalakshmi Nagar Extension, Tamil nadu 607 001. 5. The District Registrar The Cuddalore DRO office, Sub Jail road, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu 607 001. 6. Arul Prakash No.320(5), Balamurugan Kovil Street, Oraiyur, Panrutti, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 26.05.2025 for to conduct proper enquiry and cancel the Sale deed in the 6th respondent name (Arul Prakash) in Old Survey no.106/11A as per Natham No.106/11A2B, Pudupettai taluk, Oraiyur village, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honourable Court. For Petitioner: Mr. AR.Prabudevan For R1 to R5: Mr. Stalin Abhimanyu, AGP Page3 of 6