VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ms Royal Bags v. The Assistant Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 3839/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Mr.TNC.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent. Page2 of 5

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated

30.08.2024. By the impugned order, the proposal in show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 27.05.2024 has been confirmed.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had suffered stroke on 25.05.2024, ie., two days before the receipt of the show cause notice in Form GST DRC 01 dated 27.05.2024.

¶5Recording the above submission and taking note of the medical certificate filed along with Writ Petition, I am inclined to dispose this Writ Petition by remitting this case back to the respondent to pass a fresh orders on merits.

¶6Therefore, the impugned order is quashed and the case is remitted back to the Respondent subject to the Petitioner filing a proper reply to the Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC – 01 dated 27.05.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned order dated

30.08.2024 as an addendum to the same within a period of thirty days from the Page3 of 5 date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7In case the Petitioner files such reply, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶8In case the Petitioner fails to file reply, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶9Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶10This Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 12-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order JAI Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Assistant Commissioner MadhavaramTiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, Room No104, First Floor, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Wall Tax Road, Chennai-600 003 Page5 of 5

C.SARAVANAN, J. JAI 12-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.Nos.4257 & 4258 of 2026 Ms Royal Bags Rep by its Proprietor Thiru Divyesh Rasiklal Patira, 32/A, Durai Abdul Wahab Street, Thiruvallur,Chennai-Tamil Nadu -600 052. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner MadhavaramTiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, Room No104, First Floor, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Wall Tax Road, Chennai-600 003. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in Order bearing Reference No.ZD330824297906R dated 30.08.2024 on the file of the Respondent, quash the same direct the Respondent to release all bank Attachments pertaining to the petitioner in a time -bound manner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Prince Simon For Respondent(s): Mr.TNC.Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.