VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

T.G.Manickam, v. The State of Tamil Nadu,Rep.By Its Secretary,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 January 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
WP Crl. 1731/2025

Judgment

O RDER

This Writ Petition(Criminal) has filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent (Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption) to take appropriate action on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.09.2025.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner submitted a detailed complaint on 17.09.2025, alleging serious financial irregularities and illegal transactions involving a sitting MLA. He further submitted that various land transactions were manipulated to boost up the property prices, involving falsification of records. Despite the gravity of the allegations, the respondent authorities have failed to act and hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that the complaint dated 17.09.2025 was received by the Directorate on 22.09.2025. He further submitted that the complaint is being processed in accordance with the mandatory procedures prescribed under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the guidelines issued in G.O.(Ms.) No.173 (Personnel and Administrative Reforms (N) Department) dated 19.12.2018.

¶4It is further submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that since the allegations pertain to an elected representative, the complaint has been forwarded to the competent authority to obtain the necessary prior approval required for conducting a preliminary enquiry or investigation. He assured the Court that the matter is under active consideration.

¶5In view of the submissions made and the fact that the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) is already seized of the matter, no further directions are required at this stage.

¶6Accordingly, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to move further in the manner known to law. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs.

22.01.2026 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order rpl To

¶1The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Resources Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA . J, rpl

¶2The Director, Department of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, No.293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai - 600 016.

¶3The Commissioner, The Kumbakonam City Municipal Corporation, Kumbakonam.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

22.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and WPMP.Crl.No.809 of 2025 T.G.Manickam ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Resources Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Director, Department of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, No.293, MKN Road, Alandur, Chennai - 600 016. 3. The Kumbakonam City Municipal Corporation, Rep.by its Commissioner, Kumbakonam. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to investigate the matter pursuant to the Petitioner's complaint dated 17.09.2025 and file a final report. For Petitioner : Mr.C.D.Johnson for Mr.S.Kannan For R2 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.