- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 January 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 1488/2026
Judgment
O RDER
Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
¶3The Petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated
30.08.2024 under Sec.73 of the respective GST Enactments passed for the financial year 2019-2020, which was preceded by a show cause notice in DRC-01 dated 03.05.2024. However, the Petitioner has failed to respond to the same and thus, suffered the impugned order dated 30.08.2024.
¶4By the impugned order, the demand that has been confirmed against the petitioner is as follows :- Page3 of 6 Year Taxable value Tax Head Tax Interest Penalty @ 10% of tax Total 2019-20 535111 CGST 48160 35008 10000 93168 SGST 48160 35008 10000 93168 Total 96320 70016 20000 186336
5.The learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner was a small operator. Therefore, the petitioner may be given partial relief.
¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.
¶7Considering the above submission and following the consistent view taken by this Court under similar circumstances, the impugned order is quashed and the case is remitted back to the respondent subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 03.05.2024 together with requisite Page4 of 6 documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated
30.08.2024 as an addendum to the show cause notice dated 03.05.2024.
¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.
¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶12It is needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page5 of 6
¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 27-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RPP To The Deputy State Tax Officer Villivakkam assessment Circle, Station No. 1, Greams Road, PAPIM Annex Building 2nd Floor, Chennai 600 006. WPoNo.o1488oofo2026 C.SARAVANANoJ. RPP WPoNo.o1488oofo2026 AND WMPoNO.o1618oOFo2026 27-01-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND WMP NO. 1618 OF 2026 Sudhakar Reddy and Sudhakar Sureddy Tax Payer, Office at No 6 2nd Lane, Madhavaram Highwy Road, Perambur, Chennai 600 011 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer Villivakkam assessment Circle, Station No. 1, Greams Road, PAPIM Annex Building 2nd Floor, Chennai 600 006 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Art. 226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in respect of proceeding in GSTIN - 33AEVPS1560G2Z72019-2020 dated 30.08.2024 by the Respondent and quash the same, consequently direct the respondent to unfreeze the Canara bank, Labbi Pet, Vijayawada, Union Bank of India, Whites Road, Chennai on his file. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Kartheeban For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.