VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.S.Rajesh v. The State by the Inspector of Police

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 January 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 1388/2026

Judgment

ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.907 of 2022, pending on the file of the first respondent Police.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 21.12.2022, the petitioner and others, who belong to a political party, without obtaining prior permission, had unlawfully staged a protest by raising slogans against the industrial estates for the befoul emission of smoke from the industries, thereby causing disturbance to the public. Therefore, the aforesaid case in Crime No.907 of 2022 was registered by the respondent Police for the offences under Section 143 of IPC and Sections 71A(1), 41(6)(a) of Tamil Nadu City Police Act.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the facts of the instant case are similar to the facts of the cases in Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District reported in (2018 2 LW (Crl) 606) and Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and others (Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019, decided on 30.08.2019), in which the proceedings were quashed. Hence, he prayed to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioner.

¶4Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police fairly endorsed the aforesaid submission.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶6In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the above said decisions would apply on all fours to the present case and that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the proceedings pending and hence, the impugned proceedings is liable to be quashed. Further, though the petition has been filed by the petitioner alone, no useful purpose would be served by allowing the proceedings to continue against the remaining accused, who are all similarly placed, and it is an abuse of process of law.

¶7Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the proceedings pursuant to the First Information Report in Crime No.907 of 2022, on the file of the respondent Police is hereby quashed in its entirety. 29-01-2026 SRM

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. SRM To

¶1The Inspector of Police, P-5, M.K.B. Nagar Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai.

¶2The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 29-01-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA R.S.Rajesh ..Petitioner Vs 1. State by The Inspector of Police, P-5, M.K.B. Nagar Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai. (Crime No.907 of 2022) 2. G.Ambethkar The Inspector of Police, P-5, M.K.B.Nagar Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai. ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and quash the proceedings as against the petitioner in Crime No. 907 of 2022, pending on the file of the first respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.Mohamed Riyaz For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Additional Public Prosecutor For R-1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.