VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

N.Ganesan v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 8304/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 10.05.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an online application on 10.05.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent. Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) accepts notice on behalf of the second respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 3 and 4, notice to the respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's application.

5.No prejudice will be caused to the first respondent if the said authority is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the respondents 3 and 4 and any neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to the respondents 3 and 4 and any neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the first respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the first respondent, the second respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 10-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District.

2.The Inspector of Police Thalaivasal Police Station, Salem District. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

10-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. N.Ganesan S/o.Nallathambi, West Kattukottay, Unathur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District. 2.The Inspector of Police Thalaivasal Police Station, Salem District. 3.V.Dharmaraj S/o.Vadivel, West Kattukottay, Unathur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk,Salem District. 4.Rama D/o.Dharmaraj, West Kattukottay, Unathur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk,Salem District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 1st respondent to survey the petitioner Agriculture land with the help of the 2nd respondent in survey Nos.166/2A and 143/8 and patta no.2005 and fix the foundry stones in four side of the survey numbers and the property situated at Unathur village, Thalaivasal Taluk and Salem District and by passing order petitioner online payment and E- Challan dated 10.05.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Velu For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 Mr.V.Meganathan Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R2 R3 and R4 – notice dispensed with

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.