VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Marimuthu v. The Tashildhar,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 January 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 1612/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his application, dated 11.04.2025, with the assistance of the 2nd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

11.04.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the 1st respondent is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land Page No.2 of 4 owners as well as any other party as they deem fit within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the 1st respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the 1st respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, with the assistance of the 2nd respondent, if required, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) There shall be no order as to costs.

23.01.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp To

1.The Tahsildhar, Office of the Taluk, Sankagiri, Salem District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thevoor Police Station, Salem District. Page No.3 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

23.01.2026 Page No.4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.01.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Marimuthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildhar, Office of the Taluk, Sankagiri, Salem District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thevoor Police Station, Salem District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 11.04.2025 made by petitioner for measurement of the lands and pathway in connection with Survey Number 488/2, 0.72.50 cents situated at Araseramani Village Bit No.2, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District, with aid of the 2nd respondent in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Venkates For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate [R1] Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R2] ***** Page No.1 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.