VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Yuvaraj v. The State Rep. by

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 December 2025
Bench
P.Dhanabalauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 35520/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Dhanabal

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

14.11.2025, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 127(2), 351(2), 108 of BNS @ Sections 296(b), 127(2), 351(2), 108, 191(2), 115(2) of BNS Act, 2023 (Corresponding Sections 294(b), 342, 506(2), 306, 147, 323 of IPC) in Crime No.246 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the deceased, who is sister son of the defacto complainant and stayed with her. On 12.11.2025 at about 08.00 am the deceased informed that he obtained loan from accused-1 and therefore, he went to the village of A1. Wherein the deceased was brutally attacked by A1 and her family member and friends fro returning the loan and also abused with filthy language. From 12.11.2025 to 14.11.2025 the deceased abused and threatened to repay the loan amount. Later, the deceased went to his house and committed suicide by hanging on 14.11.2025. Hence, the present case came to be registered.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration from 14.11.2025 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is no previous case against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

¶6Considering the nature of offence and the petitioner is not a named accused in the First Information Report and based on the confession statement of the co-accused he was included in this case and no previous case against the petitioner and also fact that the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai, and on further conditions that:- [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30.a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

26.12.2025 dna/rsi Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. P.DHANABAL,

J. dna/rsi To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police Tiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.246 of 2025)

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

26.12.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.12.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Yuvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep.by its the Sub-Inspector of Police Tiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.246 of 2025) ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.246 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Sathiyaraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.