VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Venkatesan v. The State Rep By, the Sub-Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 December 2025
Bench
P.Dhanabalauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 35916/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Dhanabal

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 296(b) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, in connection with Crime No.247 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant trespassed onto the land of the petitioner, and due to which, there was a wordy quarrel between them. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case based on the false information. Hence, he would pray to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that no one was hospitalized in this case. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the nature of the offences and also the fact that no one was injured in this case, and no previous cases against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023. 30-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order sp Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pernamallur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. P.DHANABAL J. sp

30-12-2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Venkatesan Petitioner Vs State by: Sub-Inspector of Police, Pernamallur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.247 of 2025 Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of the arrest of petitioner by police for the reasons stated in the petition, in connection with the case in Crime No.247 0f 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.Anbharasu A For Respondent: Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.