- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 December 2025
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL OP 35767/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Dhanabal
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
12.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, 1992, in Crime No.285 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, the petitioner attacked the de facto complainant with his hands and threatened him with dire consequences.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the allegations are false; and that in any case, further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation and sought for grant of bail to the petitioner.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the defacto complainant has been treated as an outpatient; and that there is no previous case against the petitioner.
¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶6Considering the nature of allegations, the fact that the defacto complainant has been treated as an outpatient; the fact that the petitioner is on bail in other cases and since, further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation and period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023. 26-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Jeni/rpl Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code To
1.The State Rep By Its, The Inspector of Police, Royakottai Police Station, Krishnagiri, District Cr.No.285 of 2025
¶2Learned Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai.
¶3The Superintendent, District Prison, Dharmapuri.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. P.DHANABAL J. Jeni/rpl
26-12-2025
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL 1. Anbu Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Rep By Its, The Inspector of Police, Royakottai Police Station, Krishnagiri, District Cr.No.285 of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge him on bail in Cr.No.285 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A. Balamurugan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.