VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

B.Rajan v. The Govt of Tamil Nadu

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 February 2026
Bench
Hemant Chandangoudarauthor
Case no.
WP 29651/2018

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner seeks the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, assailing the communication dated 14.05.2012 insofar as it concerns the petitioner, and seeking a consequential direction to the respondents to extend the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.210, P & AR (Per.S) Department, dated 11.03.1987, by counting the service rendered in the Selection Grade of the lower post, namely Warden, from 03.06.2000, and to award Selection Grade in the higher post, namely Tutor-cum-Warden, from 03.06.2010, along with all attendant benefits including arrears of pay.

¶2Heard Mr.R.Saseetharan, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs.S.Anitha, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents.

¶3The petitioner seeks extension of the benefits under G.O.Ms.No.210 dated 11.03.1987, which stipulates that the service rendered in the Selection Grade of a lower post shall be counted as Selection Grade in the promoted post, provided that the Selection Grade scale of the lower post is identical to the ordinary grade scale of the higher post, and that such concession will be allowed only at the first level of promotion.

¶4In the counter affidavit filed by the fifth respondent, it is stated that the petitioner's service from 03.06.2000 to 20.04.2008 and thereafter from

20.04.2008 onwards was in different cadres, and that the scale of pay applicable to the petitioner also varied during these periods. Therefore, the petitioner's claim is not covered within the stipulated period (i.e., between 01.01.2006 and

31.05.2009), and further, his service from 03.06.2000 to 03.06.2010 was in two different cadres with different time scales of pay.

¶5The averments made in the counter affidavit have not been rebutted. In light of the same, the petitioner is not entitled to the benefits under G.O.Ms.No.210 dated 11.03.1987.

17.02.2026 Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No dna To

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Principal Secretary to the Government P&AR Department Fort.St.George Chennai 9.

2.The Principal Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Finance Department Fort.St.George Chennai 9.

3.The Principal Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Backward Class and Minority Welfare Department Fort.St.George Chennai 9.

4.The Commissioner Backward Class Welfare Department Chepauk Chennai 5.

5.The District Backward Welfare Officer Erode District Erode. HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR.J., dna

17.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR B.Rajan Tutor Cum Warden Government Boy's Hostel (Most Back Ward Welfare) Arrachallur Erode District. ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Principal Secretary to the Government P&AR Department Fort.St.George Chennai 9. 2.The Principal Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Finance Department Fort.St.George Chennai 9. 3.The Principal Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Backward Class and Minority Welfare Department Fort.St.George Chennai 9. 4.The Commissioner Backward Class Welfare Department Chepauk Chennai 5. 5.The District Backward Welfare Officer Erode District Erode. ...Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in relation to the Government Letter No.7296/S/2012/1/p and AR(S) Department dated 14-5-2012 and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to extend the GO.Ms.No.210 P & AR (per.S) Dept dated 11th March 1987 to count the service rendered in selection grade of lower post namely Warden from 3-6-2000 and to award selection grade in the higher post namely Tutor cum Warden from 3-6-2010 and to grant all attendant benefits including arrears of pay. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Saseetharan For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.