VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Arunmozhi v. P.Kumar

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 April 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
CMSA(MD) 3/2012

Judgment

J U D G M E N T Though the matter was listed on 05.04.2023, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

10.04.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No ebsi To

1.The District Judge, Karur.

¶2The Sub-Court, Kulithalai, Karur District.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Judgement made in C.M.S.A(MD)No.3 of 2012

10.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.M.S.A(MD)No.3 of 2012 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2012 Arunmozhi ....Appellant/Respondent/ Respondent Vs. P.Kumar ... Respondent/Appellant/Petitioner PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 13(1) A read with 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, read with 100 of C.P.C, against the judgment and decree passed in C.M.A.No.11 of 2008, dated 08.06.2010, on the file of the learned District Judge, Karur in H.M.O.P.No.29 of 2006, dated 14.12.2007, on the file of the learned Sub-Court, Kulithalai, Karur District. For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.