Arulmary v. Sebastian

J U D G M E N T When this matter was listed on 12.09.2023, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellants and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption, 'for dismissal' today (15.09.2023).

¶2Today, even though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, the learned counsel for the appellants is not present to prosecute the appeal. The learned counsel for the respondents is present. It shows that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

15.09.2023 RR To

1.The Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam

2.The District Munsif, Valangaiman

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

,J.

RR

15.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.Arulmary 2.Deivasahayam 3.Punniya Mary 4.Lourdu Mary 5.Fathima Mary ... Appellants Vs. 1.Sebastian 2.Arokya Mary 3.Yesuraj ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 06.07.1998 passed by the Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam in A.S.No.61 of 1994 reversing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif Court, Valangaiman dated 08.03.1994 in O.S.No.414 of 1990. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan