VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Pandia Prabhakar v. Duraichamy

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 March 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
CMA(MD) 707/2013

Judgment

J U D G M E N T Though the matter was listed on 29.03.2023, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

31.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The Additional District Court (FTC), Dindigul.

¶2The Additional Sub-Court, Dindigul,

¶3The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi C.M.A.(MD)No.707 of 2013

31.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR C.M.A(MD)No.707 of 2013 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2013 R.Pandia Prabhakar ..... Appellant/ Respondent/ Plaintiff -vs- 1. Duraichamy 2. Shanthi .... Respondents /Appellants/ Defendants PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of Civil Code Procedure, against the order of remand made in by the judgment and decree in A.S.No.35 of 2009 by the Additional District Court (FTC), Dindigul dated 11.04.2011 reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.334 of 2001 by the Additional Sub-Court, Dindigul, dated 03.12.2004. For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr. S.Anand Chandrasekar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.