- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 723/2007
Judgment
J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that he has returned the bundle long back. However, the matter was listed on 27.07.2023, with the name of the counsel for the appellant. Therefore, he has sent a letter to the appellant on 31.07.2023, to get instructions. The said letter was received on
01.08.2023 by the appellant. Even after receipt of the same, he has not turned up.
¶2In view of the above, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
10.08.2023 akv To
1.The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil.
2.The II Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv
10.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.Krishna Swamy ... Appellant Vs. 1.Usha Kanagasabapathi 2.Muthaiah ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.128 of 2005, dated 10.04.2005 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.172 of 1999, dated 22.12.2004 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Nagercoil. For Appellant : Mr.C.T.Perumal For Respondent : Mr.R.Murugan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.