VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tony Cherian v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 January 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 1244/2026

Judgment

ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to implement the order passed by the first respondent vide proceedings Na.Ka.A5/6083/2023 dated 28.03.2025, and to issue patta for the land property measuring 51 cents, consisting of 30 cents in S.No. 58/7 and 21 cents in S.No.58/4, Murungoor Village, Ramanathapuram District, within such time as may be stipulated by this Court.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the third respondent, notice to the third respondent is hereby dispensed with.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the lawful owner of the land property measuring 51 cents, comprised of 30 cents in S.No.58/7 and 21 cents in S.No.58/4, Murungoor Village, Ramanathapuram District. He further submits that the first respondent has already passed an order in Na.Ka.A5/6083/2023 dated 28.03.2025 directing the issuance of patta in favour of the petitioner. Despite the order of the first respondent, the second respondent has failed to implement the same and has not issued patta in respect of the property. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶5The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the second respondent requires ten weeks' time to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶6Recording the above submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the second respondent to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner and all other persons, who may be interested in the subject matter, within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the second respondent to consider the same on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

21.01.2026 smn2 To:-

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Tahsildhar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

21.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Tony Cherian ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildhar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 3.Raju ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to implement the order passed by the first respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.A5/6083/2023 dated 28.03.2025 and issue patta for the land property with an extent of 51 cents which is consisting of 30 Cents in S.No.58/7 and 21 Cents in S.No.58/4 in Murungoor Village, Ramanathapuram District, within a stipulated time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanidhi For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.