- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 772/2008
Judgment
J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the sole appellant and the second respondent passed away. Memo has been filed to that effect. Till date no steps have been taken to implead the legal representatives of the deceased person. Once the sole appellant died, if steps have not been taken within 90 days, the appeal will be abated automatically.
¶2In this case, till date no steps have been taken and hence, this appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No
04.09.2023 am To
1.The Sub-Court, Valliyoor.
2.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. am
04.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Rajan Durai ... 1st Respondent/1st Defendant Vs. 1.Selvin ... Appellant/Plaintiff 2.R.Jebamaniammal 3.Manickaraj ...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants 2 & 3 2 & 3 PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.1 of 2007 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor dated 01.04.2008 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.158 of 2006, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri dated 29.07.2004. For Appellant : Mr.M.P.Senthil For R1 : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh For R3 : Mr.P.Jeyapaul
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.