- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 April 2023
- Bench
- P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 295/2021
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and had also submitted a letter dated 28.03.2023 to the Registry in this regard.
¶2In view of the above letter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
03.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi P.T.ASHA
, J.
mbi
03.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA WP(MD)No.295/2021 & WMP(MD)Nos.226 & 227/2021 S.Gnanaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Civil Designs and Hydro Projects, TANGEDCO, 144, Annasalai, Chennai - 600 002. 2.The Superintending Engineer/M-II, Tuticorin Thermal Power Station, Thoothukudi - 628 004. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the impugned notification in Lr.No.SE/MII/TTPSA/EE/AHP/FAM/F.26/D. 01/21 dated 02.01.21 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to remove the entire quantity of dry fly ash under Agreement dated 04.04.2019 within a period that may be prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.