Chinnakannu v. E.Venkatammal

JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo dated 21.02.2023 stating that the first respondent is no more. The said memo is recorded.

¶2The second appeal is arising out of a suit for bare injunction filed by the first respondent. The suit was decreed by the trial Court and the appeal filed by the appellants herein/defendants 6 and 7 was also dismissed by the first appellate Court.

¶3In view of the fact that the first respondent died three years back and the second appeal is already abated as against the contesting first respondent, the Second appeal is dismissed as abated. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

21.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No cp To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Theni.

¶2The District Munsif, Theni.

3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SOUNTHAR

, J.

cp

21.02.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.02.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 1.Chinnakannu 2.Sennivasan ...Appellants -Vs- 1.E.Venkatammal 2.Ramasamy Nayacker 3.Seethalakshmi 4.Velmurugan 5.Sivakumar ... Respondents (Notice not necessary, since the respondents 2 to 5 are having same rights along with appellants) PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the decree and judgment dated 06.06.2011 passed in A.S.No.2 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Theni, thereby confirming the decree and judgment in O.S.No.51 of 2006 dated 12.11.2009 on the file of the District Munsif, Theni, with costs in favour of the appellants/defendants 6 & 7 with the respondents 2 to 5/defendants 2, 3 to 5. For Appellants : Mr.A.Shahul Hameed For Respondents : No appearance