M.Sagunthala v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the matter has become infructuous as the orders requested for have already been granted.

¶2Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

23.03.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Special Tahsildar, (Natham Settlement Scheme), Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. P.T.ASHA

, J.

mbi

23.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA WP(MD)No.1487/2020 & WMP(MD)No.1191/2020 1.M.Sagunthala 2.M.Ilamaran ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Special Tahsildar, (Natham Settlement Scheme), Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 3.A.Ilangovan, IAS, Thevanoor Village, T.Pudur, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the impugned enquiry notice and proceedings in Na.Ka.Aa6/56/2019 dated 16/10/2019 issued by the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.J.Bharathan For Respondents : Mr.A.Sivanupandian Government Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.T.Vadivelan for R3