VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muthusamy(Died) v. Rajendran

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 June 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 2080/2013

Judgment

ORDER When the case was called up for hearing on 09.06.2023, there was no representation on the side of both the petitioners and the respondent. Hence, this case was posted today under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.

14.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No BTR

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. BTR To

1.The District Munsif Court, Sivagangai.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

14.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 1.Muthusamy (Died) 2.Subramanian 3.Lakshmanan (Died) 4.Rani 5.Duraimurugan 6.Sureshkumar 7.Suganthi 8.Kanagam 9.Rajadurai 10.Radha ... Petitioners (Petitioners 4 to 7 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased first petitioner vide Court order dated 23.03.2022 made in C.M.P(MD)Nos.1836, 1838, 1839, 1840 and 1842 of 2022 in C.R.P(MD)No.2080 of 2013) (Petitioners 8 to 10 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased third petitioner vide Court order dated 23.03.2022 made in C.M.P(MD)Nos.1836, 1838, 1839, 1840 and 1842 of 2022 in C.R.P(MD)No.2080 of 2013) Vs. Rajendran ... Respondent PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 26.09.2013 passed by the District Munsif Court, Sivagangai in I.A.No.491 of 2013 in O.S.No.114 of 2008. For Petitioners : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.