- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 January 2023
- Bench
- P.D.Audikesavalu
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 316/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Heard Mr. S.Vellaichamy, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. T.Villavankothai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for First to Third Respondents, Mr. D.Gandhiraj, Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Fourth and Fifth Respondents, Mr. C.Guhaseelarupan, Learned Counsel for the Sixth Respondent and Mr. S.Manohar, Learned Counsel for the Eighth Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.
¶2The grievance ventilated by the Petitioner is that in the proceedings dated
10.08.2022 sent by the Sixth Respondent to the Superintendent of Police, Madurai, the following passage, which was not part of the minutes of the Peace Committee Meeting held on 10.08.2022, has been included:- "nkYk; 11/08/2022 kw;Wk; 12/08/2022 Mfpa ,U jpd';fspy; midj;J jug;gpdUk; mtu;fspd; gHf;f tHf;ffg;go tUle;njhUk; Mo khjk; filrp tpahHd; kw;Wk; bts;spf;fpHikfspy; neu;j;jpf; fld; brYj;Jk; tifapy; fplha;btl;o rhkp Fk;gpLk;bghGJ vt;tpj mrk;ghtpjKk; epfHh tz;zk; TLjy; ghJfhg;g[ tH';f ntz;LkhW md;g[ld; nfl;Lf; bfhs;sg;gLfpwJ/"
¶3The Sixth Respondent has filed an Affidavit dated 09.01.2023 stating as follows:- "It is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Sixth Respondent to withdraw the particular sentence "Mo khjk; filrp tpahHd; kw;Wk; bts;spf;fpHikfspy;" in the above operative portion as well as the word "Mo khjk;" mentioned in the subject portion of the impugned order dated 10.08.2022 passed by the Sixth Respondent which was not mentioned in the order of the Fifth Respondent dated 10.08.2022 and thus render justice" In view of the same, the Sixth Respondent shall issue fresh communication to the concerned authority in supersession of the impugned order dated 10.08.2022, which shall stand modified to that extent In fine, the Writ Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.
09.01.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes /No sj Note: Issue copy of the order by 30.01.2023 To
1.The Commissioner of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nungambakkam, Chennai.
2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Ellis Nagar, Madurai.
3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Ellis Nagar, Madurai..
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai District.
5.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J. sj W.P.(MD) No. 316 of 2023 Dated : 09.01.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.01.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU W.P.(MD) No. 316 of 2023 A.Chinnaiah ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Ellis Nagar, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Ellis Nagar, Madurai.. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai District. 5.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 6.Takkar / Fit Person, Arulmigu Nevinatha Ayyanar Thirukovil, E.Malampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 7.Vijayarahavan 8.N.A.Chandran ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 10.08.2022 of the 6th respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Vellaichamy For Respondents : Mr. T.Villavankothai Additional Government Pleader For R1 to 3 Mr. D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader For R4 & R5 Mr. C.Guhaseelarupan For R6 Mr.S.Manohar For R8
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.